The abolition of private property, is also the denial of charity and generosity. Additionally the private ownership of something transfers the pride in its quality to its owner- no wonder public infrastructure in the West is declining, there is nobody who privately owns it, and their pride is tied to it, just as much as their desire to uphold their responsibility to it. Then people would ask "then why does privatisation not work", but privatisation goes to publicly traded companies... companies not owned by a single or few people who would hold pride in good quality. As such, they are beholden to shareholder value, and also lose accountability, responsibility and pride too. This form of privatisation is this Thatcher-like... Ronald Reagan-like economic policy- these are the same sorts of people in common society called conservatives(but they don't really conserve much of anything do they? It is like calling a communist a conservative). The state publicly own this infrastructure, is just as rubbish as they divide their accountability, pride of ownership and desire to uphold their responsibility through many sieves of bureaucrats so that responsibility is so finely lost in the process. When it's presented like this, efforts to privatise or publicise infrastructure effectively becomes... do you want it controlled by corrupt incompetent people or competently corrupt people?
All these roads lead to people owning nothing(except perhaps their living quarters which is why they are decorated so thoroughly with walls of Funko Pops and all sorts of stuff. Surely I'm not alone in noticing how the youth who own little often have well decorated if garish rooms). It's the same play by the WEF- "You will own nothing and be happy". The same play by the Communists. You see something similar in ones own- that expression meaning their children and not some strange concept of "publicly owned children" that by putting them in the care of teachers and care givers for most of their childhood who have just the same amount of motivation as you'd expect them to have of kids who aren't their own... Well the results speak for themselves. They match the fall of the Soviet Union with their fertility rates dropping from
2.1 to 1.2 from 1965-2000(meanwhile South Korea, which is the common benchmark for this kind of accelerationist decline nowadays was at 1.48)
No wonder if we live in a society that wants us to "Own nothing and be happy", all the way from top to bottom, that it would bleed into raising our own. This point also goes back to those wealth inequality and oligarch issues which I've commented on in other posts on the forum too- though with these it's slightly rephrased from abolishing private property into the everyman owning nothing, and the megarich owning everything(which isn't much different or much better than the state owning everything).
Weather forecast: Cloudy.
