SolidStateSurvivor
This is Extremely Dangerous to Our Democracy
There's been a comment that has stuck with me for a few months now, I saw it as means of speculating the nature of a raid conducted on an Area 51 website admin. It was something to the effect of how there exists enough partial information out there in documents and on the net to piece together the bigger picture of classified Intel. It was speculation that the site admin may have been getting too thorough in his research, and that this raid was conducted as a warning of sorts. I'm unsure of just how true it is, but it got me thinking.
Given how far the AI/machine learning field has come, where we have technology like ChatGTP that can write essays with accurately cited sources, would it be theoretically possible to create and feed such a program enough primary source material for it to connect the dots and fill in censored/partially blacked out documents? There's plenty of primary documents out there related to shady happenings, but a shortage of man power to thoroughly comb through it all.
So what if the human element was removed? Instead the AI is tasked with the research of all available material, and then does it's best to fill in the redacted info and provide sources elaborating on it's speculation.
Is this at all feasible? Could it yield accurate information in place of redactions and usher in a new era of information transparency?
Given how far the AI/machine learning field has come, where we have technology like ChatGTP that can write essays with accurately cited sources, would it be theoretically possible to create and feed such a program enough primary source material for it to connect the dots and fill in censored/partially blacked out documents? There's plenty of primary documents out there related to shady happenings, but a shortage of man power to thoroughly comb through it all.
So what if the human element was removed? Instead the AI is tasked with the research of all available material, and then does it's best to fill in the redacted info and provide sources elaborating on it's speculation.
Is this at all feasible? Could it yield accurate information in place of redactions and usher in a new era of information transparency?