- Joined
- Jul 26, 2021
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 5,156
- Awards
- 262
Crypto. Its funny money. A bit too funny to be money some would say.
Yes, we've got our bitcoins and ethereums. We've got vapourware, privacy coins, use cases, and memes. We've got NFTs, rugpulls, and ponzi schemes. Some want the death of fiat, some want to avoid the watchful eyes of those-who-glow-in-the-dark, and some just want to make a quick buck. I'd guess most of us in the forum are well aquainted with the world of digital currencies so this post won't be a primer on that.
Regardless of what side of the fence you might fall into, I want to discuss an idea I've had recently whilst thinking about the concept of memecoins. I believe that in our ultra-modern, borderline post-scarcity world, money, be it crypto or not, might lose its ability to determine value.
Let me make my case.
Memecoins are absurd in every sense of the word. We're seeing the inception of assets that are technically devoid of value, yet by sheer popularity are capable of propelling individuals into billions in net-worth. Do mind that due to how liquidity works, net worth is not equal to real usable value. Its just what hypothetically someone is worth. So you might say, "Whatever dude, the money is coming from point A and ending up in point B, what's the big deal?" Enter hyperinflation and money supply.
Money supply goes from M1 to M4. Let me give you some quick definitions:
M1 is real, usuable money. Cash.
M2 is assets easily convertible to money. Like your savings. (That your bank is not obligated to return to you if supply of M1 is scarce)
M3 is basically institutional money. Stores of value and stocks.
M4 is commercial paper. IOUs. Its money backed only by an issuing bank or company that promises to pay the amount on a certain date, and its not backed by collateral. This is where things get fucky, especially as banks are able to loan debt to each other. In my opinion, its money that doesn't exist but nonetheless is used. And I think that's in part why we see countries and banks with huge debts that are basically of no consequence.
Allright, next.
The gobby is printing a lot of money.
And much of it is to bail institutions.
The point being, with the institutional adoption of crypto, I think we're seeing a bit of that M4 invisible money turn into M3 and M2 money. Something like tether (a stablecoin pegged to the value of one dollar, who is being investigated of basically printing money) artificially inflating the value of bitcoin.
If that money does trickle down from institutions to individuals in enough amounts, well, I don't know what the fuck would happen. But my guess would be that money would just stop representing value, and much like memecoins, attention and popularity would become the prime representative of worth. Afterall, it seems we've been eschewing the physical for the digital.
I'll end this by sharing one last image.
This is a real billboard for a memecoin in new york city. Shit's weird.
Yes, we've got our bitcoins and ethereums. We've got vapourware, privacy coins, use cases, and memes. We've got NFTs, rugpulls, and ponzi schemes. Some want the death of fiat, some want to avoid the watchful eyes of those-who-glow-in-the-dark, and some just want to make a quick buck. I'd guess most of us in the forum are well aquainted with the world of digital currencies so this post won't be a primer on that.
Regardless of what side of the fence you might fall into, I want to discuss an idea I've had recently whilst thinking about the concept of memecoins. I believe that in our ultra-modern, borderline post-scarcity world, money, be it crypto or not, might lose its ability to determine value.
Let me make my case.
Memecoins are absurd in every sense of the word. We're seeing the inception of assets that are technically devoid of value, yet by sheer popularity are capable of propelling individuals into billions in net-worth. Do mind that due to how liquidity works, net worth is not equal to real usable value. Its just what hypothetically someone is worth. So you might say, "Whatever dude, the money is coming from point A and ending up in point B, what's the big deal?" Enter hyperinflation and money supply.
Money supply goes from M1 to M4. Let me give you some quick definitions:
M1 is real, usuable money. Cash.
M2 is assets easily convertible to money. Like your savings. (That your bank is not obligated to return to you if supply of M1 is scarce)
M3 is basically institutional money. Stores of value and stocks.
M4 is commercial paper. IOUs. Its money backed only by an issuing bank or company that promises to pay the amount on a certain date, and its not backed by collateral. This is where things get fucky, especially as banks are able to loan debt to each other. In my opinion, its money that doesn't exist but nonetheless is used. And I think that's in part why we see countries and banks with huge debts that are basically of no consequence.
Allright, next.
The gobby is printing a lot of money.
And much of it is to bail institutions.
The point being, with the institutional adoption of crypto, I think we're seeing a bit of that M4 invisible money turn into M3 and M2 money. Something like tether (a stablecoin pegged to the value of one dollar, who is being investigated of basically printing money) artificially inflating the value of bitcoin.
If that money does trickle down from institutions to individuals in enough amounts, well, I don't know what the fuck would happen. But my guess would be that money would just stop representing value, and much like memecoins, attention and popularity would become the prime representative of worth. Afterall, it seems we've been eschewing the physical for the digital.
I'll end this by sharing one last image.
This is a real billboard for a memecoin in new york city. Shit's weird.
Attachments
Last edited:
Virtual Cafe Awards