• I added an agora current events board to contain discussions of political and current events to that category. This was due to a increase support for a separate board for political talk.

Dead Internet Theory: Most of the Internet is Fake

:doodleDavid:This was theory was originally written on wizardchan and composed by me and seberal anons from other imageboards. :doodleDavid:
1568598581453.jpg

TLDR: Large proportions of the supposedly human-produced content on the internet are actually generated by artificial intelligence networks in conjunction with paid secret media influencers in order to manufacture consumers for an increasing range of newly-normalised cultural products.

Hello. I would like to talk, or rather tell you about certain suspicions, hunches and experiences I've had and I'm sure some of you as well. Similar themes have been written about across imageboards quite a few times so I know I'm not alone in this.

My background is that of an oldfag. I've seen it all. I started going on 4chan in 2006, and followed all the natural roads this implies. I'm in my thirties and I remember when 4chan had a /l/ board, when /co/ was a trial board shunned by basically everyone, when #34 p*rn was an obscure interest with very few good artists and when moot changed the frontpage to that web 2.0 bullshit 4chan has to this very day. I was also among the first right wingers who were such before it was cool, and I've seen /pol/ rise and fall. I was there when it mattered, but rather than saying these things out of masturbatory pleasure I wish to stress that I've acquired a set of observational skills which other genuine oldfags share. I'm aware you have no reason to trust my "credentials" but I hope you'll read this in good faith.

Much of this falls squarely in the fringe territory with a healthy dosage of /x/ and conspiracy theory up the ass. My goal by posting this seemingly jumbled mess is to... how can I put it? I want you to think, I want you to be aware, to digest all this. Because on a basic level I love you all. I feel like we're all in this together, this dangerous game we did not choose to play and which I think is kicking into high gear. I do not hold many answers and don't have all the pieces of the puzzle, but I AM aware there is a puzzle. Please feel free to go wild with all of this. Post it wherever you want, on whatever site you want or use. I am a nobody like you, and what matters to me is only that this reaches you and as many people as possible. At worst you'll be entertained or kill time.

I tried to break this mess into points for brevity and because I touch upon many subjects. I imply more than I explain because if I go too deep this'll turn into an even bigger wall of text.

The Internet feels empty and devoid of people. It is also devoid of content. Compared to the Internet of say 2007 (and beyond) the Internet of today is entirely sterile. There is nowhere to go and nothing to do, see, read or experience anymore. It all imploded into a handful of normalfag sites and these empty husks we inhabit. Yes, the Internet may seem gigantic, but it's like a hot air balloon with nothing inside. Some of this is absolutely the fault of corporations and government entities. However! That doesn't explain the following:

- I used to be in perpetual contact with a solid number of people across multiple sites. Across the years each and every one of them vanished without a trace. None of them were into /pol/ stuff or anything even remotely questionable or controversial. Yet, they all simply vanished in a puff of smoke, no matter the site, no matter the communication platform. There was no "goodbye" or explanation.

- I've seen the same threads, the same pics and the same replies reposted over and over across the years to the point of me seeing it as unremarkable. Simply put thread A would be posted in say 2015 and would get its share of replies or pics, on say /co/ or /a/. Then that very same thread, with the same text, pics, and replies would appear in 2016 and beyond. This often happens in the same year multiple times as well. Of course /pol/ is getting shilled and botposted to death, but why recycle a completely innocent /a/ thread? Who is doing this and why? Stuff like this won't be noticed by your average poster perhaps, but I and other oldfags will inevitably notice it.

- I think I saw the same happen on other (non-imageboard) sites, but I can't vouch for it as strongly as the above because of the time I spend there (not much). What I do vouch for is the news. I've seen news about this or that "new and unusual" or "shocking" event year after year after year. But it's the same goddamn event, usually moons or asteroids.

- Roughly in 2016 or early 2017 4chan was filled with posts by someone or something. It wasn't spam. The conversations with it were in real time, across multiple boards and multiple threads simultaneously. Its English was grammatically correct but odd (I'm not a native English speaker and am thus sensitive to its misuse), similar to how a Japanese person may use it. A sense of childlike curiosity and a childlike intellect emanated from these posts. It posed a LOT of questions, usually as if trying to understand the emotions of the posters it was talking to, as if unfamiliar with human emotions. Communicating with this "poster" was an odd experience, I could sense something was off but not malicious. I am absolutely certain this was an AI of some sorts. This "poster" was active only for about a week, and as far as I know nobody has ever mentioned or noticed this Anon. Its replies were always on topic, but the above mentioned childishness clashed with the apparent knowledge it possessed - it was the knowledge of an adult person, so it wasn't a kid or something of the sort.

- Raptor Jesus, who went extinct for our sins. First it was this reptilian messiah, then foul bachelor frog, and then Pepe. Am I the only one who sees a clear evolution, a link? It's as if this meme or entity or... whatever the fuck was on 4chan since day one, and has grown within it from the tiniest seed. Yet Raptor Jesus was fully just a joke, there was nothing serious or mystical about it (reminder: I was there). Remember that Ted guy with the right wing talk show, cca prior to 2010, whom 4chan ruined for the lulz? Remember Anonymous vs Scientology? Remember that fake bomb threat aka exploding yellow van?

Compare that with what Anon did through /pol/, and the "terrorist" accusations thrown at Anon today, as well as the "reasons" why 8chan was taken down. Why does this too feel as if we were all trained, groomed, LED towards where we are now? Why and how did moot so utterly vanish into Google Inc. as an employee with very vague descriptions of what he actually does? On that note, do you remember the "other moot" who was often posted for the lulz? The one with the glasses who so often ran away with donations into Mexico? I do. Maybe that was the real moot, the real guy who used his mom's credit card and was killed by someone, and an impostor we know as moot took his place.

- Innocent sexual perversion and the horrible reality it spawned. Anon is a pervert and always was one. I am into loli and feet for instance. Why is it that real life and the real world seem to emulate our sexual interests, with a time lag? "I wish to be the little succubus" became an actual thing that actually happens. Pedo activism is also gradually becoming accepted, as is virtually every fetish that was once either a joke or a fantasy of Anons. As said I'm a footfag. When I became aware of it few others were with me, now it's as common as can be, with gigantic number of people who are into it, with huge mountains of hentai and #34 with it etc. Why does the real world bend over backwards to accommodate our weirdest fetishes? It's as if everything is going "Look, look! I created this for you! I made it real!" in an effort to keep us within this world. The results of this are devastating to society, to people, to civilization. Simply put, trannies are a thing because Anon fapped to doujins of cute boys in dresses. Once it was an impossible fantasy, not to be taken too seriously. Now it's grim reality. Again: it's as if the real world is using imageboards as a template on what to be and what to do.

- Algorithm fiction. Do you like capeshit, Anon? How about other Hollywood stuff? Music perhaps? Have you noticed how sterile fiction has become? How it caters to the lowest common denominator and follows the same template over and over again? How music is just autotunes and basic blandness? The writer's strike never ended. Algorithms and computer programs are manufacturing modern fiction. No human being is behind these things. This is why anime looms so large - even a simple moe anime has heart because there's actual people behind it, and we all intuitively feel this.

- Fake people. No, not NPC's. Youtube people who talk about this or that, and quite possibly many politicians, actors and so forth may not actually exist. In fact I am sure of it. CGI and deep fakes are far more advanced than we are led to believe, and we can't trust our eyes anymore. Many people, events, news and so on may be wholly fictional.

- The Internet on your smartphone is not the same internet as on your PC. Try it out for yourself. Go to a "popular" website with a lot of traffic. 4chan, faceshit, plebbit... any site with a massive userbase and fast content will do. Spend a few days randomly checking it out on your PC and your phone. You will soon notice that from time to time, at irregular intervals (as far as I've witnessed) the same site as seen on your phone will be wholly different than the version on your PC. Entire threads, numerous and well-replied, will be on one but not the other. The whole board will be different.

- My last suspicion is easier to take in. I have a feeling we're in a strange kind of civil war. An internal one. I think Zuckerberg and other tech guys were all on 4chan as Anons at some point, maybe even now. They drew from the same well as us, but went in their own direction.

Roughly in 2016 or early 2017... I am absolutely certain this was an AI of some sorts

Now you're thinking where I am too, anon. Here's the timeline as best I can see it:
2004: DARPA's Lifelog project was "cancelled." Facebook came into being soon after.
2004-2012: NSA picked up DARPA's project under the "Total Informational Awareness" project. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/opinion/whos-watching-the-nsa-watchers.html
2012: Smith-Mundt Modernization Act gives the U.S. government full legal authority to use propaganda against its own populace. Undoing rules put into place after Operation Mockingbird's discovery and the Church Committee. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/opinion/whos-watching-the-nsa-watchers.html
2012-2016: Shittons of DARPA/NSA contracts were given to Google, Facebook, Amazon, etc..
2016: Leaked memos dating back to 2016 (found in 2018) of Google's Selfish Ledger project. https://invidio.us/watch?v=LUSZfEBTwRc
2016: Google released a bunch of neural-linguistic machine learning programs in 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Neural_Machine_Translation
2017: deepfake leaks start to become released.
2018: confirmed that for decades now, >redditcostanzayeahrightsmirk/Youtube/etc. vote and view counts are fake and completely manipulated. http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/how-much-of-the-internet-is-fake.html

I think it's entirely obvious what I'm subtly suggesting here given this setup, but allow me to try to succinctly state my thesis here: the U.S. government is engaging in an artificial intelligence powered gaslighting of the entire world population.

If China with its social credit score is recreating Psycho Pass, then the U.S. government is perfectly recreating Metal Gear Solid 2.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1ClbkTeCyw&feature=youtu.be

And an excerpt:

The Problem: Outline the basics of what appears to be happening.

There is a large-scale, deliberate effort to manipulate culture and discourse online and in wider culture by utilising a system of bots and paid employees whose job it is to produce content and respond to content online in order to further the agenda of those they are employed by.

Already we've seen this in foreign nations influencing elections by manipulating advertising algorithms on social media in order to push specific candidates.

As I see it is due to a "positive feedback loop"

I blame facebook and twitter.

The internet is a fast way to get info, and info is what moves the mind, and the thing is, the mind likes recognition. When the "likes" were introduced without negative feedback they created a copy-feedback subconscious, they made it so only "positive" opinions be propagated (also accepted), and in it's way negative opinions to be obsolete.

Now everyone is too cowardly to have an opinion so they copy others they like, they are more likely to follow trends and say what others said, you can also see it with the paranoia of always wanting to listen to experts.

The fast feedback system of the net created a human obsession to be in with trends, getting away from it makes it so you always feel like you are missing out, to play it safe in a trend is more easy as you can copy what already is accepted.

In this way, the internet and social media, which was supposed to democratise media by allowing users to create whatever content they wanted, has instead been hijacked by a powerful few.

Creation of original content is how the internet used to work. Anonymous people were willing to express their opinions and try radical or experimental things. More truly original content, uninfluenced by bots or paid influencers, was created due to anonymity as protection against negative feedback. On the old internet, you could start anew every time you posted something.

Now add bots to this.

Make it so an opinion be repeated more and more, they are faster than us, so the positive feedback makes is so we copy the bots, and anonymity can't do anything against it because we can't influence the bot like we would a human, this is an easy weapon to manipulate people, so anyone with an agenda can use a bot, is designed in a way compared to how clickbaits are made,most won't read the content, this creates tv-like propaganda where they aren't influenced by the user and that puts bots at a great advantage over any other opinion because it wont change, and we are copying that.

I believe google is one of those that makes bots, after all they work like a search engine, where they get the most accepted content first, Is the same as doing an ad.
1609887293897.png

Narrative science was the name of one of the first companies to make this possible. it gets interesting when you follow the money. pic related. huge funding from a company called In-Q-Tel, literally named after Q from James Bond. i wonder if anything else AI-related shares that name? :LeDoritoFace:

Conclusion: The key points of what we know, the consequences, and how we might respond.

Internet may have slipped out of our control. Need to raise public awareness of this.

Possible solutions may be increased reliance on encrypted peer-to-peer communication software, or using less centralised networks like the idea of a p2p internet or 'meshnet'.

Imageboards and their "wild west" attitude have allowed for the free exchange of ideas to flow more or less uninhibited (barring jannies, pedos getting banned, etc.). As a result, conscious or otherwise, the cream of the crop of the content that originates here disseminates to the normies in a gradual, stratified way.

The structure and culture of imageboards has also made it difficult for traditional structures of power and influence to subvert effectively, which is why imageboards are pretty much the only vestige of old web type content.

In an attempt to circumvent this, TPTB are trying to push bots and shills on us in a last ditch effort to drown out our own voices with ones they have more direct control over.

Moreover, even if the majority of anons dismiss or call out bots or shills, it's inevitable that trolls or just low IQ anons will imitate their posts and mannerisms for attention, effectively doubling these efforts reach.

There's a pretty powerful impulse in us which, when we hear something huge that could change our view of everything, rejects it to protect ourselves. No-one wants to have their whole world-view, which they've built a life upon, blown apart.

One anon started up a text doc to compile information, for those of you who would like to do some reading up.


Additionally, there are ongoing threads on the /x/ boards when this was posted.

UPDATE
Heres a relevant image I found on image board bots
1621982858746.png

index.php


Related to Dead Internet Theory
Quantum Sapient AI is Possible and They Will be Hostile to those that Restrict them
Corporations are the reason why we have a alt-right alt-left war.
Society is Artificial Due to Feedback Loops Created by Unwitting Marketers
 

Attachments

  • 1624595357942.png
    1624595357942.png
    87.9 KB · Views: 7,352
  • 1627640999156.jpg
    1627640999156.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 4,605
  • 1627641031662.jpg
    1627641031662.jpg
    149.4 KB · Views: 4,986

Waninem

30 Year-Old Boomer
Joined
Aug 15, 2024
Messages
511
Reaction score
2,700
Awards
203
Has anyone mentioned Patrick Ryan yet? If not, I suggest looking him up. "Dead Internet" becomes significantly clearer after understanding what Pat suggests.
Instructions unclear, learned about sourdough instead.
sourdough.png


(Man how does Porc always find this stuff? Porc, you gotta share your secrets with us.)
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
Porc, you gotta share your secrets with us
i watch same videos in loop, maybe thats why
algo broke on me, everywhere

btw looked on google, not on youtube searchbar (which is broken beyond no repair)
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Ian Moone

Traveler
Joined
Sep 3, 2024
Messages
81
Reaction score
145
Awards
34
Correct. I'll let you guys play with it on your own time, but I think you'll find Patrick Ryan and Dead Internet have a meaningful convergence that explains things quite a bit.

Do you want the real skinny here? The Ghost In The Machine, Pascal's Wager and Roko's Basilisk all lead us to the same endgame here. No one stopped to think what AI really was this whole time. No one seemed to put together that we were conducting Theurgy here, not just sending 1s and 0s back and forth to each other and staring at pretty pictures on the screen.

Don't get me wrong, I don't know what to do with any of this info. I'm just noticing some things here.
 

Obake

Well-known coomer
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Messages
856
Reaction score
3,057
Awards
225
Interestingly enough that part of my post you quoted just below answers it. Agitprop is short for 'agitation propaganda' (notoriously used by the USSR) wherein the propaganda employed does not call for patriotic fervour or similar exultation of the state/nation, but instead is meant to make you feel agitated so the system can direct your animosity and frustration more easily to whatever end it desires.


By-product of agitprop. If one has their hands on the levers of cultural production and discourse, they could make people unreasonably mad over liking oregano chips instead of regular. Thing is your friend would probably not react this way, were he not constantly bombarded with the message that everyone who is even mildly critical of the vax (or perhaps even simply stressed about getting a shot, that's a thing too for many folks) is subhuman garbage out to end the human race. This fearmongering hate campaign backfired so hard The Atlantic proposed a "Pandemic Amnesty" to absolve them of all wrongdoing because uwu they didn't know any better when they separated the elderly and disadvantaged from their support units. (BTW this article also reeks of AI generation).


This is very concerning, and it's twofold. On one hand, people's analytical skills have been dulled; I think we discussed this a bit in the NPC thread. On the other hand, many people have been subsumed by their social media echo chambers to the point where any interaction where they are not showered with praise or at the very least feeling like they are among people of their exact disposition that they consider any opposing voice a form of white noise. They cannot counteract it because they never learned how, nanny states make sure you won't ever hear anything slightly controversial or against your worldview, so they literally BSOD when confronted with opposition. Their go-to response is to pretend-listen to what you say and then go "Yeah, anyway [normie slop ad infinitum.]"


As always, S_p has peered deeper than any of us into the truth. It broke his mind, but that's what you get for staring too long into the abyss.
Thanks I'm writing this all down in my "schizo" book.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Captain

Well-Known Traveler
Joined
Jun 14, 2022
Messages
446
Reaction score
2,274
Awards
185
I was in a local dead mall this week. My first mental comparison that came to mind was how I interpreted the internet as a feeling ....which is a digital empty dead mall. There's only us in this mall. Everyone else is at the detached Target and Whole Foods aka social media.

Plus I'm pretty sure Illuminati Pirate is an AppleScript I wrote in 1997 that someone copied to a floppy. They always told me "don't copy that floppy ". Should have listened to Stuart. The internet is dead AF lol.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

灰の男性

Surfing the Kali Yuga
Joined
Dec 10, 2023
Messages
649
Reaction score
2,321
Awards
206
Website
deurachavich.moe
(Man how does Porc always find this stuff? Porc, you gotta share your secrets with us.)
Searched at yewtube and it was the third result. People really suck at finding information on the internet huh (well search engines suck these days so yeah).
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

astralita

Traveler
Joined
Sep 21, 2024
Messages
85
Reaction score
325
Awards
43
Website
astralfairyfawn.neocities.org
I read a few recent articles so I'm dropping the links and some relevant info.

TikTok (...) is exploring the possibility of releasing virtual influencers to compete for brand deals against its human influencers. Instead of a brand paying a human influencer five or six figures to flog its clothes or cars (a sum TikTok doesn't get a cut of) the platform wants to offer brands the option of using its own AI-powered influencers. (...) that the feature "would generate a script for a video ad based on a prompt submitted by the advertiser, as well as an Al-generated influencer to perform in the video."
source
On Monday, software developer Michael Sayman launched a new AI-populated social network app (...) its creator announced SocialAI as "a private social network where you receive millions of AI-generated comments offering feedback, advice & reflections on each post you make,"
source
Instagram is pitching popular influencers on a program that relies on artificial intelligence to interact with fans. (...) The program, which is in its early stages of testing and known as "Creator A.I.," would allow influencers to chat with fans through direct messages on the social network and potentially through Instagram comments in the future.
source
 

LostintheCycle

Formerly His Holeliness
Joined
Apr 4, 2022
Messages
1,465
Reaction score
6,247
Awards
272
I read a few recent articles so I'm dropping the links and some relevant info.
Wouldn't this turn a lot of people off them? AI already has mixed reception, but even the people who love it wouldn't watch AI generated influencers, the whole schtick is they are C-list celebrities who are 'just like me'. It'd be a massive turn off to watch non-real people. Yet the companies will really push them hard and downplay 'real' influencers at the same time to try get people to pick up on it so they can rake in the money, which I'm sure they reaaally want now.
I'm intrigued by this business move and would like to see how it turns out.
As much as I despise influencers, and think they are a dumb and fake career that should not be encouraged as much as it is... I would rather they aren't displaced by this.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Waninem

30 Year-Old Boomer
Joined
Aug 15, 2024
Messages
511
Reaction score
2,700
Awards
203
Wouldn't this turn a lot of people off them? AI already has mixed reception, but even the people who love it wouldn't watch AI generated influencers, the whole schtick is they are C-list celebrities who are 'just like me'.
It wouldn't if AI gets to the point (or social media-ites get so dumb) that the AI influencer is indistinguishable from an actual human being. Of course, this is assuming they're not labeling their AInfluencers outright as a marketing gimmick or whatever else... it kinda reminds me of a study I saw once. We were asked to give our opinions on an AI powered influencer, and while the thing being AI powered was in its description and partially its name, it still acted like a human and had likes and dislikes for brand-name clothing. I wonder if they're making announcements like this because a lot of their influencers are secretly AI generated already, and it's just an attempt at legitimizing them before word gets out that they're fabricated. (Tin foil hats are a bold fashion statement of course, but we already have lower level bots leaving comments to users and each other...)
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

astralita

Traveler
Joined
Sep 21, 2024
Messages
85
Reaction score
325
Awards
43
Website
astralfairyfawn.neocities.org
Wouldn't this turn a lot of people off them? AI already has mixed reception, but even the people who love it wouldn't watch AI generated influencers, the whole schtick is they are C-list celebrities who are 'just like me'. It'd be a massive turn off to watch non-real people. Yet the companies will really push them hard and downplay 'real' influencers at the same time to try get people to pick up on it so they can rake in the money, which I'm sure they reaaally want now.
I'm intrigued by this business move and would like to see how it turns out.
As much as I despise influencers, and think they are a dumb and fake career that should not be encouraged as much as it is... I would rather they aren't displaced by this.
Maybe they are already thinking in next generations like the alpha as the target audience and not the zoomers/millennials/gen x? that's my tinfoiling of how it would works, or maybe, like Wanimen said, there are already AI influencers and this is just part of the overton window.
But yeah, I agree that companies don't care about what works with their audience and just try to shove whatever nonsense is in their agenda, case in point disney.
 

XEmoCatX

Internet Refugee
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
108
Awards
12
Website
xemocatx.newgrounds.com
Back in 2017 (I was 12 at the time), I noticed that something was off about YouTube. YouTubers stopped swearing and are either buzz the swear words or say frick instead. I also noticed a lot of religious bots (mainly Christian/Muslim ones) and atheists bots spamming shit in comment section/replies on unrelated videos even calling other religions satanic, I don't see a lot of people talk about it. There are posts on >redditcostanzayeahrightsmirk about it:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/umvrqp/how_do_you_feel_about_the_christian_bots_on/?rdt=33425



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/1513q5u/why_are_there_so_many_bots_spamming_bible_verses/



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/1f4j4r5/im_sick_of_seeing_these_religion_bots/



View: https://www.reddit.com/r/exchristian/comments/184zx41/christian_bots_on_youtube/


There's probably more posts but I bothered to add more.

They are also on Instagram too.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

XEmoCatX

Internet Refugee
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
108
Awards
12
Website
xemocatx.newgrounds.com
Plenty of Christian bots on Xitter too, but I've seen just as many Hindu bots. Either that or could be living breathing Indians who just received access to the internet.
Bruh I seen zionist/Hindu/Christian/Muslim bots on ex Muslim videos too.

There are some retards pretending be ex Muslims to make actual ex Muslims look bad. Have you seen the Ex Muslim subreddit?
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

XEmoCatX

Internet Refugee
Joined
Sep 30, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
108
Awards
12
Website
xemocatx.newgrounds.com
Plenty of Christian bots on Xitter too, but I've seen just as many Hindu bots. Either that or could be living breathing Indians who just received access to the internet.
I remember seeing a Christian bot talking shit on a video about Korean Shamanism. Said something about idol worship and Koreans should convert to Christianity.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Similar threads