minorminer
Someone has posted a similar thread which I will link if I can find it again, but this is an extension on the idea that Agora Road (AR) is a data collector and trainer for AI.
Humans on this site, and possibly even bots, consider the following:
If AR is used for data collection, then the humans who do populate this site are quite naive for the following reasons:
1.) Most who use this site are familiar with the dead internet theory. Thus, they know internet traffic is largely populated by bots.
2.) Most who use this site have notions that the internet is something that has become homogenized and therefore controlled by an oligarchy.
3.) If the former are true, then those who use this medium (the internet) are using an already compromised means of communication for the sake of expressing "anti-establishment" sentiments within what is actually the "new establishment," one spied on and controlled by said oligarchy.
4.) If all the former are true, then the internet is the absolute worst place to express such notions.
So, why would a community like this composed of those who value freedom use a medium which is composed of the very things they antagonize? Why use the internet for these sorts of things at all, i.e. expressing sentiments about the changing world and where it is going and what the problems are and potential solutions (if any solutions at all have been posited here)? Wouldn't it be better to start your own agora at where you are than using something composed of all the aforesaid?
Isn't all of this quite ironic?
If all of this is true, then isn't using this site complete rubbish and an exercise in futility by means of using the very things you struggle against?
What is being said:
The internet is not safe. You don't know who the bot is and who is human. This has been debated on this site before and accusations have been made, but the truth is that it's absolutely foolish to make such accusations, believe such things as what has been stated, and go one believing that this site is a true agora. The agora was the marketplace, you know, where there were actual humans discussing things, not a place where the human was out of sight. Moreover, it occurred outside, you know, in the sunlight.
So, I love the site, but its subject and what it purports to execute is absolutely non-negotiable given the facts, that is, if all things stated in the Consider are true. And if all true, then this is indeed a failure, albeit a creative and beautiful, it is a failure.
Humans on this site, and possibly even bots, consider the following:
If AR is used for data collection, then the humans who do populate this site are quite naive for the following reasons:
1.) Most who use this site are familiar with the dead internet theory. Thus, they know internet traffic is largely populated by bots.
2.) Most who use this site have notions that the internet is something that has become homogenized and therefore controlled by an oligarchy.
3.) If the former are true, then those who use this medium (the internet) are using an already compromised means of communication for the sake of expressing "anti-establishment" sentiments within what is actually the "new establishment," one spied on and controlled by said oligarchy.
4.) If all the former are true, then the internet is the absolute worst place to express such notions.
So, why would a community like this composed of those who value freedom use a medium which is composed of the very things they antagonize? Why use the internet for these sorts of things at all, i.e. expressing sentiments about the changing world and where it is going and what the problems are and potential solutions (if any solutions at all have been posited here)? Wouldn't it be better to start your own agora at where you are than using something composed of all the aforesaid?
Isn't all of this quite ironic?
If all of this is true, then isn't using this site complete rubbish and an exercise in futility by means of using the very things you struggle against?
What is being said:
The internet is not safe. You don't know who the bot is and who is human. This has been debated on this site before and accusations have been made, but the truth is that it's absolutely foolish to make such accusations, believe such things as what has been stated, and go one believing that this site is a true agora. The agora was the marketplace, you know, where there were actual humans discussing things, not a place where the human was out of sight. Moreover, it occurred outside, you know, in the sunlight.
So, I love the site, but its subject and what it purports to execute is absolutely non-negotiable given the facts, that is, if all things stated in the Consider are true. And if all true, then this is indeed a failure, albeit a creative and beautiful, it is a failure.
Last edited by a moderator: