Max Chill
Involuntary Hikikomori
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2022
- Messages
- 183
- Reaction score
- 987
- Awards
- 112
This thread has been viewed 1932 times.
Maybe on an emulator it's better but on the PS2 Drakengard is so poorly optimized you winds up pissing and shitting itself constantly. The Ending C bossfight is borderline unplayable later on because of it. Or more likely I just suck at video games in general. Maybe both.Take your medicine. Despite what /v/ told you Drakengard is actually very fun to play, in addition to being beautiful. And the characters are not psychopaths. And you are not on the same level as your enemies. You kill them by the hundred. What the fuck are you saying?
Those clankers got nothing on the 501st.Battlefield/Battlefront, BFII(2005)'s campaign is even framed as the recollections of a common soldier after the war, although you play as any number of random clones.
Am I supposed to be impressed? It's one of the most pathetic things I've ever seen. Apehoop is a loud, hideous, obnoxious game redeemed by only in its physical incarnation by the viscerality of the game and the physical feats required to play well.
If we take away the physical aspect what are we looking at? An even more ugly and pathetic League of Legends
I think you completely failed to understand me. I was just trying to get you to be into the most stereotypical nigga shit ever and maybe hoping you would do some funny mental gymnastics like how you would play only aryan players players or something, its just a joke don't get too hanged up into it. Also if its all aesthetics maybe this might be more up your alleyYou've completely failed to understand me. If I wanted to deal with a complex system with many human parts I'd get a job. We can work interdependence and stakes into anything. How about 9v9 Sudoku with each player being responsible for writing the numbers into one square. Losing team gets executed after the game.
The idea of participating in a giant complex war is much more interesting to me than the idea of participating in a game of pro apehoop. The difference we might call aesthetic.
These games only got like that due to changes in business and predatory industry activities.Scale is one thing. Pace and intention are another. Battlefield and its like can get as big as they want, if they refuse to slow the fuck down they're functionally the same thing as Call of Duty since everyone is just sprinting and sliding around trying to burst down people who spawned within 5 seconds of them.
All of these games got insanely fast because the meta for mass player retention is to turn your war game into a rapid fire self esteem slot machine in which you fire yourself at the other side repeatedly and either kill someone or get killed every 30 seconds. This is not interesting to me. It's simple, stupid, and ugly. On one hand a war that feels cool is desired, and on the other, a game that's actually interesting and complex.
What koei strategy games you speak about? The only one i can thing its the Nobunaga's and Romances and that is basically just number crunching and excel sheetsYes Eve clearly has stakes and scale but really feels like it devolves into a "who can waste more time" competition. MMOs tend to do this. I don't believe that that much going on in a game is necessarily healthy. The impression is enough. I'm very impressed with how Koei games and Japanese "strategy" in general tend to sell scale without all of the absurd work of trying to build a new working world in a computer with every game. Koei games feel better for what I'm after than paradox ones.
"FOR THE CHANCELLOR!"Those clankers got nothing on the 501st.
From the way you describe it, yeah, that sounds like it fits the "not The Guy" designation.Would Starsector count? You start as a random guy with a little bit of money, you do jobs just like every other independent fleet, a random pirate fleet could destroy you in a second and a leader of a faction is the highest you can go, you could be the strongest faction but never stronger than every other factor combined.
To beat those late bosses you basically have to grind. I would say this would be more acceptable on an actual PS2 because if you're physically buying games you'll want to get more time out of each one.Maybe on an emulator it's better but on the PS2 Drakengard is so poorly optimized you winds up pissing and shitting itself constantly. The Ending C bossfight is borderline unplayable later on because of it. Or more likely I just suck at video games in general. Maybe both.
I think you completely failed to understand me. I was just trying to get you to be into the most stereotypical nigga shit ever and maybe hoping you would do some funny mental gymnastics like how you would play only aryan players players or something, its just a joke don't get too hanged up into it. Also if its all aesthetics maybe this might be more up your alley
Does anything in my post suggest that I am not aware of that? Did I not say exactly that?These games only got like that due to changes in business and predatory industry activities.
Sped up in the sense your guy can jump really high and such, but also slowed down in important ways. Lasers fly slower than bullets.The Battlefront games were literally just battlefield 2 sped up and with a star wars skin(and space battles).
I find those games very impressive. They feel far more alive than any big western strategy game I've played despite the simpler systems they run on. Even simpler ones like Uncharted Waters impress me.What koei strategy games you speak about? The only one i can thing its the Nobunaga's and Romances and that is basically just number crunching and excel sheets
I think amuse is the word you look for. Its not sniping its banter, you are just a funny persona and that is a funny scenario I thought about. I think you confuse comments that are directed at you vs comments that are directed at the thread in general in which there are both in the same post. There are no stakes because the internet isn't srs business, its just a thing a tool for optimizing irl, it isn't irl, how many times do I gotta tell you that ffs.No I don't think you should be allowed to disengage from your pathetic attempts at sniping at me. I intimidate you and you deal with that by trying to make no stakes attacks in the middle ofI ongoing discussions. Plenty of people can tell that already. By drawing more attention to this exchange maybe even more people will.
My point wasn't that, my point is that there are games from the same era like arma who are bigger scale and never changed despite the changes in industry. And that these games were never direct competitors. Games like battlefield were sold as being distinct from cod in ways other than there is vehicles my point is that they are now more similar due to those industry practices(this is an example of a comment who is directed at the thread not you.)Does anything in my post suggest that I am not aware of that? Did I not say exactly that?
No, sped up in the combat engagement sense: you can combat roll 5 times in a row, a droideka can go into a ball and travel half the map, characters have jetpacks, and insta hit shock guns, you can pretty much spam grenades back and forth in a choke point and anyone with lightsabers can clean up a room with ease.Sped up in the sense your guy can jump really high and such, but also slowed down in important ways. Lasers fly slower than bullets.
You just haven't played enough then there are many "excel simulators" as we call then, they're made to simulate board games, since the 80s they are the most stereotypical neckbeard game ever, but no they usually do not have big eyes characters on them maybe that is the aesthetics you so speak off.I find those games very impressive. They feel far more alive than any big western strategy game I've played despite the simpler systems they run on. Even simpler ones like Uncharted Waters impress me.
This place is not a joke. You want it to be because you are a faggot and you (rightly) feel that you couldn't keep up with more than that. Only you're still wrong because you also aren't funny.I think amuse is the word you look for. Its not sniping its banter, you are just a funny persona and that is a funny scenario I thought about. I think you confuse comments that are directed at you vs comments that are directed at the thread in general in which there are both in the same post.
You've said this, and there's no failure of understanding. It's just an obscenely dumb thought and I disagree with it.There are no stakes because the internet isn't srs business, its just a thing a tool for optimizing irl, it isn't irl, how many times do I gotta tell you that ffs.
Most of you people just repeat one of three Bethesda townfolk tier lines about a subject over and over again and are content for that to be a thread. I start talking seriously about a topic, generally even along the lines this place already claims to agree with (like that schools are bad) and you all freak out and make it about me because you're all failed normalfags (especially you).Also this usually just turns out into derailing the topic as you get made more and more fun of by multiple people)
Why is an Atlas fan buying Call of Duty? That's also for fat "GAYmer word" (spiritual or actual).
You're still saying things which are retarded. Arma is barely even a game.My point wasn't that, my point is that there are games from the same era like arma who are bigger scale and never changed despite the changes in industry. And that these games were never direct competitors. Games like battlefield were sold as being distinct from cod in ways other than there is vehicles my point is that they are now more similar due to those industry practices(this is an example of a comment who is directed at the thread not you.)
What?No, sped up in the combat engagement sense:
Still doesn't make sense. "sped up in the combat engagement sense". Youtube video essay brain slurry English.you can combat roll 5 times in a row, a droideka can go into a ball and travel half the map, characters have jetpacks, and insta hit shock guns, you can pretty much spam grenades back and forth in a choke point and anyone with lightsabers can clean up a room with ease.
You can clearly see the lasers in Gundam max boost but it is also clearly a faster paced game than battlefield 2 those 2 things aren't mutually exclusive.
(this is an example of a comment that is directed at you)
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ipi128LQonM
What are you saying you fucking animal? How does any one piece of this quoted section lead into any other part of it? This is like trying to communicate with someone who has been lobotomised. I don't think you can understand what I mean when I ask you why you post without having a point.You just haven't played enough then there are many "excel simulators" as we call then, they're made to simulate board games, since the 80s they are the most stereotypical neckbeard game ever, but no they usually do not have big eyes characters on them maybe that is the aesthetics you so speak off.
And in those games as I said you are more likely "the nation" rather than one specific guy.
This place is not a joke. You want it to be because you are a faggot and you (rightly) feel that you couldn't keep up with more than that. Only you're still wrong because you also aren't funny.
It's just an obscenely dumb thought and I disagree with it.
If this is directed at me why is it so hard to tell what the fuck you're saying?
There is no fixed definition of what "combat engagement" means. I'm willing to read you contextually but you did a terrible job of making this clear. You say "understand" like it's a fixed idea and it's all there to be understood.We don't need to discuss the fact that you don't understand what combat engagement means.
What's your point? It's still a technical tool first and foremost and always has been.ust as you dont know that Arma has a C&C Storyline campaign with rts elements,
I have a friend who's into Arma. I watch him play sometimes. If I had never seen the game in action before what would be your point here? Of course as always there isn't one. You aren't trying to say anything with your presence in this thread. You're desperately throwing shit at the wall hoping to make a negative impression against me stick because I'm probably the scariest person you've ever encountered in your life.But you probably only know it through watching youtube videos so your ignorance its not only expected but also understandable.
Arma is more like a game-tool than a game. To me a game is an intentional and complete experience. You could say that the "campaigns" and such the arma games come with are games. But when most people talk about Arma they don't mean these. And if we are talking about them what Arma actually is and does it's somewhat relevant to the thread but not to what was being said. Yes, you were talking to the thread. You want to say something at me again as usual but have nothing, so you're going to bring up a contrarily framed factoid to the thread while replying to me. Go fuck yourself, "GAYmer word".I guess nothing is a game if it doesn't have big eyed cartoons. Better luck next time.
Drinking with Zhuge Liang is a far more compelling, novel, and functional experience of a larger living world than Arma's depictions of squad scale gunfights that feel like a way more awkward Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon for 10000x the work.I am a successful normalfag and don't you forget it, Fatlus its an old meme you don't need to worry about it. Keep it in topic shall we?
View attachment 92986
You say "understand" like it's a fixed idea and it's all there to be understood.
You are wrong and a stupid faggot and just like every other time you were not making a joke.I understand that you don't understand.
View attachment 92998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In tetris you are not the guy, not in most puzzle games like DR mario or even games like pong or DDR where the player is the guy but there is no guy to be the player.
Are you the guy in space invaders? Or in something like this?
View attachment 92999