- Joined
- Sep 10, 2023
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 1,815
- Awards
- 149
You're right. Art should be destructive as possibleGlows.
This thread has been viewed 1442 times.
You're right. Art should be destructive as possibleGlows.
graffiti is at its core a disruption of a system. Assisting your visual cortex with the signatures of faceless men. Faceless men who will delay the train networks. Faceless men who will stop the stock market and erotically bring the system to its knees.i like art, not so much the disruption of the systems that keep things moving. literally
You're right. Art should be destructive as possible
i highly disagree with this sentiment, but i understand where it is coming from. art is disruption for sure. but disruption can turn into straight up disrespect and i'm truly not about that. disruption is just something i do not like as there's already too much entropy to begin with. i believe art takes tact. there's are sayings in fashion that "more is more" but that you should always look in the mirror and edit your look. take off an element or two. is it really necessary to wear this piece to make a statement? no. is it really necessary to disrupt in the name of art? no. but you CAN disrupt in the name of art. that's up the the artist. not the critic. but this critic thinks it lacks taste. especially when all it takes is a bit of time and tape. but again, that's the nature of this form of art. and i dislike that aspect of it since i like when things exist in unison. this "disruption" sounds more like a power trip than art.graffiti is at its core a disruption of a system. Assisting your visual cortex with the signatures of faceless men. Faceless men who will delay the train networks. Faceless men who will stop the stock market and erotically bring the system to its knees.
"There's nothing brave and nothing uselful.
You scrawling you aggro shit on the walls of the cubicle."
In that its as anon as this post board, yes."I <3 Hot Moms." It's just like the internet!
Then why reply with the disrespect mf, jk <3straight up disrespect and i'm truly not about that
is it really necessary to wear this piece to make a statement? no. is it really necessary to disrupt in the name of art?
no. but you CAN disrupt in the name of art. that's up the the artist.
especially when all it takes is a bit of time and tape. but again, that's the nature of this form of art.
Learn to set them boundaries. Sometimes that means clean walls, clean feet, telling mfs to stop tagging your gay ass name everywhere.edit: i do also believe that art is in everything and that a power trip can be beautiful, but that's more of a personal journey thing. like good for you. bad for me. and it ok. i just don't like it.
I do love the idea of trying to spread some sort of political message across with art and vandalism- but my question is if it even does anything.there are spots on my commute that are landmarked by graffiti. a politically driven sticker on a sign.
post graffiti or other forms of artistic vandalism here. your stuff or anything you see in public.
wtfEDIT: By the way, the OP just sounds AI generated. Idk if this is how u type or something but it sounds robotic (atleast parts of it do).
better use the latest chatGPT model so they don't figure you out next time
highkey chatGPT stole my whole flow. my old username was o2mini and then those freaks launched o3-mini.better use the latest chatGPT model so they don't figure you out next time