gwen
戈文
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2022
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 308
- Awards
- 71
i now think possibly so due to philosophical evidence. imo points in favor include
- formal equivalence to conventional model via sphere inversion
- absent center of inverted sphere corresponds to conformal limit of universe
- re-establishes earth as global focal region (container of world, not center)
- gives spatial identification of aliens from space as demons
- dual identification of earth and water creatures as angels
- human milieu occurs over across inflection boundary of heaven and the other place
on the other hand, the main point against as i see, is that while it may work metaphysically for humans, it may also be seen as disrespectful to such good aliens as may actually exist. what do others think?
- formal equivalence to conventional model via sphere inversion
- absent center of inverted sphere corresponds to conformal limit of universe
- re-establishes earth as global focal region (container of world, not center)
- gives spatial identification of aliens from space as demons
- dual identification of earth and water creatures as angels
- human milieu occurs over across inflection boundary of heaven and the other place
on the other hand, the main point against as i see, is that while it may work metaphysically for humans, it may also be seen as disrespectful to such good aliens as may actually exist. what do others think?
Last edited: