- Jan 22, 2023
- Reaction score
No because midget porn is 100% legal and most midgets are single.however with the fictional context of the loli character actually being 1000 years old both problems cease to exist as a 1000 year old person will obviously be mature enough to handle a relationship and if their natural physiology merely is just loli then it should be able to handle the physical aspects of the relationship as well.
Yes and no.The base reasons things are considered moral or immoral in real life are irrelevant in the creation of fiction and the justification or lack thereof in fiction does not alter the reasoning behind morals in real life
People will run over people on gta to let off some steam instead of doing actual violence.
When a person beats to lolicon he is letting off the steam instead of making cheese pizza.
Whether that is better or not matters not if he still feel the urge, Many people will easily and casually tell you That they are about to go postal after a 6day 14hr shift week, not many people will tell you that they're gonna pull a edp.
Violent feelings are acceptable to most humans, you just let off in the gym, in a videogame, at the range etc. Most humans will feel the urge to punch someones head off at least once in their life and more likely the will feel it multiple times during their life span.
Lust feelings for pre teens aren't acceptable for most humans. Therefore ways to let them off are also not accepted because of the small space of possible actions that can exacerbate lust.
If you met someone really enjoys the Torture game for 3 hours everyday without missing a day and makes it a core part of their identity their profile picture and talk about it all the time. Would that raise red flags? Its not about what is fictional and what's real its about the mindset rationalizing the action behind it.
Of course you don't wanna have thought crimes but as you said
Implicitly means that a person is attracted to child looks, which in the real world only children look like it, and that comes with all the prejudices and caveats that comes with.fictional context that alters the base moral argument from a child to a person who just looks like a child.
Its not about what is philosophically moral or not its about protecting real life children.
Even if you have a logical gotcha or find a loophole people would simply rather be unfair to those who feel those feelings, its just human nature and its hardcoded in.
The worst thing that can happen to you from being gay its to have a blow out asshole, If you are 2 adults its whatever, gay porn does not simulate queers taking advantage of pre teens(or at least i hope not), Lolicon does.or that whole suppressing the gay thing from 70 years back would have worked out better.
The acceptance of letting people fudgepack its pretty much irrelevant in the bigger scheme of things, A couple of homos aren't worth the trouble for a capitalist society to suppress because some people think its gross, as long as both have the possibility of working 40hrs a week the economic world couldn't care less.
If you take a drink or two(depending on the jurisdiction) you are not allowed to drive, fly or sail, operate machinery, technically have consensual sex, contribute to the delinquency of a minor or even BE IN A PUBLIC PLACE while under the influence.To continue your own analogy, I would consider non-pedo's to be people that don't drink at all, a pedo that keeps himself to fictional things as someone who only takes a drink or two without going overboard, and fully engaged pedo's as the alcoholics. While it's not an ideal situation to have to take one or two drinks to function it's far better than falling into alcoholism because you tried and failed to completely abstain.
I don't think anybody would oppose those restrictions to lolicons tbh.
Virtual Cafe Awards