GENOSAD
...or something equally edgy.
So here's a question I've been pondering for a while, and it's something I'd like to get other peoples' opinions on: Is Barber Beats the death of Vaporwave?
Let me start off by pointing out the 2009 vaporwave era where the act of "slowing and reverbing" wasn't even a defining feature of Vaporwave. There are several songs in ECCOJAMS alone that actually speed up some samples in addition to looping 2-to-5-second segments of certain songs. This "looping" technique was actually more prevalent than slowing down a song, as was the method of chopping up portions of a song and re-arranging them to make a new experience.
It was Macintosh Plus who popularized the concept of slowing everything down by doing just that in his Floral Shoppe album, which is how the misconception of Vaporwave being "a song that's just slowed and reverbed with no other changes" came about. It's easiest to see how someone would arrive to this conclusion by listening to "ライブラリ," which I would argue makes the least changes to its samples out of the whole album. As far as "slowing and reverbing" goes, this is probably the closest that Vaporwave got to it before exploding in popularity.
Barber Beats is the ultimate conclusion of this process. While previous forms of Vaporwave were more concerned with remixing samples to make a different experience, Barber Beats does nothing more than the slowing and reverbing that can be associated with newer or less talented Vaporwave artists. To me, it seems like the popularity of Barber Beats is its own sort of resignation with Vaporwave as a whole. It's done. It's finished. Why bother trying at this point? Let's just do the bare minimum.
With all this said, what I'm really asking is whether or not Barber Beats is:
a. A de-evolutionary "dead end" of Vaporwave
b. Resorting to the bare minimum because we know that there's nothing new to be done with Vaporwave
c. Deserving of its popularity
(ik I probably got a bunch of facts wrong here, pls don't hurt me)
Let me start off by pointing out the 2009 vaporwave era where the act of "slowing and reverbing" wasn't even a defining feature of Vaporwave. There are several songs in ECCOJAMS alone that actually speed up some samples in addition to looping 2-to-5-second segments of certain songs. This "looping" technique was actually more prevalent than slowing down a song, as was the method of chopping up portions of a song and re-arranging them to make a new experience.
It was Macintosh Plus who popularized the concept of slowing everything down by doing just that in his Floral Shoppe album, which is how the misconception of Vaporwave being "a song that's just slowed and reverbed with no other changes" came about. It's easiest to see how someone would arrive to this conclusion by listening to "ライブラリ," which I would argue makes the least changes to its samples out of the whole album. As far as "slowing and reverbing" goes, this is probably the closest that Vaporwave got to it before exploding in popularity.
Barber Beats is the ultimate conclusion of this process. While previous forms of Vaporwave were more concerned with remixing samples to make a different experience, Barber Beats does nothing more than the slowing and reverbing that can be associated with newer or less talented Vaporwave artists. To me, it seems like the popularity of Barber Beats is its own sort of resignation with Vaporwave as a whole. It's done. It's finished. Why bother trying at this point? Let's just do the bare minimum.
With all this said, what I'm really asking is whether or not Barber Beats is:
a. A de-evolutionary "dead end" of Vaporwave
b. Resorting to the bare minimum because we know that there's nothing new to be done with Vaporwave
c. Deserving of its popularity
(ik I probably got a bunch of facts wrong here, pls don't hurt me)