Kreislauf
Pepsi inspector
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 27
- Awards
- 23
This thread has been viewed 1745 times.
Also#2: I suggest you to listen to Soviet Era Synth-Pop, is kino.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCjE8LKSTe8
Ok, as a fan of sovietwave, no, sovietwave is not a subgenre of vaporwave, is a subgenre of synthwave, which makes use of soviet era synthesizers (more specifically, the polivok), the communist inspired vaporwave subgenre is called "Labourwave" which like fashwave, is mostly aesthetic and doesn't have any difference with any vaporwave song (unlike sovietwave, which is original on it's own), it is also popular between the soviet nostalgia enthusiasts due to the idea of the dead dream of lenin and the future that never was (it also had a lot of the space race aesthetics too)
The polivok (it can be a plugin too)
View attachment 16244
Sovietwave aesthetics:
View attachment 16245An example of Labourwave.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLMTNFkKcaI
And the soviet nostalgia:
View attachment 16246
How so? One of the first soviet synth bands was Argo from Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic. They were formed in 1979 and were waaay experimental. I'd call them barely listenable.the Soviets were huge pioneers of synth music
As much as I'd like to agree with it, this is simply not true, and the reason is stated above. Especially for the first part of the 80's, before perestroika and stuff, synth music was pretty much considered western music, with all the consequences of it. Nothing too heavy, but to get a record in the studio was next to impossible.arguably made more synth music than we did in the 80s
You underestimate the Soviet Union's potential in terms of its ability to conceptualize the future, which had been a core tenet of the Union since its inception, and which also happens to be a necessary component of electronic music. Keep in mind that Hong Kong was a puppet state of Britain until 1997- a country under a monarchy isn't going to create music of the future, it's going to create stuffy, aristocratic fluff. When I listen to a band like Original, on the other hand, I find that it's decades ahead of its time, an unparalleled cosmic voyage. Maybe the reason you don't understand great Soviet synth music isn't because it has some kind of "timelag-" it's probably because the Soviet Union was such a sophisticated civilization that its greatness will only be understood in centuries to come. Their music is positively kickin'!How so? One of the first soviet synth bands was Argo from Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic. They were formed in 1979 and were waaay experimental. I'd call them barely listenable.
At that point there were already years of true pioneers of synth being on the scene. Like, Kraftwerk, for example.
In fact, given how close West Germany was to USSR, one can tell it took really long time for soviets to jump on the synths. Synths in the USSR took hold approximately at the same time they took hold in US. And there was a good reason to it: the Iron Curtain and inner soviet politics.
As much as I'd like to agree with it, this is simply not true, and the reason is stated above. Especially for the first part of the 80's, before perestroika and stuff, synth music was pretty much considered western music, with all the consequences of it. Nothing too heavy, but to get a record in the studio was next to impossible.
The band Original you've attached is a prime example for it: Davron Gaipov has only been able to make several records because his father was a big political figure. And even then it backfired on him: he eventually got caught into political games and got sent into Siberia for five years.
Arguably, Hong Kong alone likely dished out more synthesized music than the whole Soviet Union during the 80's. Once again, this place had a huge timelag.
Keep in mind that Hong Kong was a puppet state of Britain until 1997- a country under a monarchy isn't going to create music of the future, it's going to create stuffy, aristocratic fluff.
First of all, how does a form of government on its own has anything, literally anything to do with its art or artists? Even individual people's ability to conceptualise the future only depends on a form of government indirectly. Have you listened to Hong Kong music, saw it's movies? They are bonkers, definitely not anyhow stuffy or aristocratic.~snip~
Not to be a downer, bro, but wouldn't that then have to apply to the UK's musical output? As one example, Brian Eno's My Life in the Bush of Ghosts (1981) is pretty forward looking with its use of samples.
And then there's Gary Numan.
etc. etc. etc.
That said, I like the way you try to look at music from a wider social perspective.
Brian Eno ... His compositions are measured, calculated, precise.
totally. i recommend "как дела у твоего друга в сером городе" by konets solnyechnik dney. start on song 2
Anyone else a fan of the "Coldwave" genre? It's a subgenre of post-punk.
totally. i recommend "как дела у твоего друга в сером городе" by konets solnyechnik dney. start on song 2