Personally I find "da joos" to be a midwit cope by /pol/tards who can't grasp a working model of either national politics or geopolitics with more than one group vying for power.
What I find most often, is that someone has decided that they are being virtuous by believing a label about the claimant. If you have to ask yourself if it's okay to believe something, you're not thinking for yourself; you're passing it through a consensus filter because you are afraid of being ostracized by the same label applied to anyone who does not have an approved opinion.
I think a very small number of jews are objectively doing evil things, and that the majority shouldn't be judged by the minority at the top. I think the minority at the top has been institutionally powerful among their people longer than they have been among nations of the earth.
My problem comes down to this, instead of:
* Checking the claim(s) for themselves. -> This is racism.
* Investigating the claimant's sources. -> This is racism and stupid.
* Noting and matching the pattern across multiple claims. -> This is racist and stupid, you're not allowed to think for yourself because you draw unapproved conclusions.
They believe the label from the media source they consider to be "agreeable" and restate the label. They get a feel good shot of do-gooder-ism and a pass to disclaim and dismiss the arguments they have never even tried to engage with.
If you can go and do the research; then I think you should do so. You can prove me wrong if you like. Go and look at MSNBC's ownership and leadership. Go and look at Disney's ownership and leadership. Go look at the Federal Reserve's leadership. Pick a bank or investment house. Find the company officers. Look at Biden's cabinet. Early life, wikipedia. A small group of insular people who consider their race to be the superior race, have institutional power in the world; laud it in their own racially targeted newspapers, like
https://www.haaretz.com/ and are in the hallmark positions of power in every country through banking, media, market finance, law, politics, and entertainment. They don't represent the entire ethnicity by any stretch of the imagination, but they are dominant powerbrokers throughout the western powers, and even Russia. Even the Russo-Ukrainian war is Eastern vs Western Money Changer. Who on earth else could finance these things?
Bottom line: Don't judge an entire ethnicity by the 1% of evil at the top; but the 1% of evil at the top is of that group, using "whiteness" as a scapegoat. They print your media, run your websites, control your social media feeds and timeline, they program your tv, the radio, and every other influence on society at large, while controlling education, finance, law, and policy. They control what you think if you trust the media they control, which is to say a virtual monopoly.