On The Topic Of A Societal Collapse

i_am

seeker of the mold room
Joined
Nov 20, 2021
Messages
37
Reaction score
191
Awards
22
personally i dont think society will collapse in conventional means, you know the heat big freeze theory for how the universe will end, where all energy is gone and all that's left are black holes? I think it'll be like that for humanity, where even though we may exist for thousands of years more--our evolution in philosophy, art and ideas will ultimately be absent.

Notice how everyone says the same joke about how 100 years ago, people imagined flying cars? The entire point of the joke is that compared to today, the people of the past were optimistic and imagined a brighter future, while our current people today see no hope, besides maybe a 1% increase in their wages.

I think we will just not imagine anything anymore, the lack of ideas is quite concerning yet at the same time it really feels moody for a dystopian post-apocalyptic world-building setting where thought and ambitions have ended.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
Frankly I am more interested in returning to a stable existence in harmony with the planet. I am not interested in dying on some planet somewhere theres no oxygen or water. I just want to live in peace, tend to some crops, tend to my pangolin-family, and maybe read a few books that were scavenged out of various ruins of libraries.

Not interested in our highly inefficient, inhumane, ruinous existence, where every single scrap of dollar and value has to be extracted or its "wasteful" and where the vast majority of humans are one change in the profit/cost balance away from the unemployment line.

Its in-humane, its deeply un-human, and I am sick of this shit. I finally have words to explain my deep displeasure with the world and a desire to see it all burn down. I know it seems morbid, but it really all does have to burn down. To be free, we have to burn it all down.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

SundryKlepto453

Internet Refugee
Joined
Nov 16, 2023
Messages
7
Reaction score
33
Awards
4
i think anybody interested in societal collapse should definitely watch this video:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WPB2u8EzL8


it's a very very sober and logical look at what societies exactly are and the systems behind them, an in-depths look at the core moving parts of a structure like our society. it mostly all boils down to Energy Return On Investment, a system like our society must increase its Energy Return to grow, and during that growth it evolves complexities to more efficiently harvest that Energy Return and it's almost impossible to de-complexify. and the short and long of this video is that unless we develop cold fusion (or similar advancement in Energy Return) our society will totally collapse at the hands of resource depletion and over-complexification, it's simply inevitable. and the sooner it happens the more of our natural world can be saved. so hopefully "collapse", as communities around the internet call it (on >redditcostanzayeahrightsmirk /Collapseaware) happens sooner rather than later.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

mesaprotector

Active Traveler
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
169
Reaction score
478
Awards
64
"If the world is about to end, plant a tree." - paraphrase from the Islamic Hadiths

I'm an unhappy person; I know this. During COVID I had it pretty good - I lived with my friend for six months doing house repairs, then I moved up to Alaska where nobody cared about lockdowns and made more friends than I've ever made in my life. Meanwhile the rest of the world, finally, was miserable. I think the lockdowns (aside from the first couple months when we really didn't know what was going on) were a horrible mistake. But I definitely felt a sense of peace I never had before or since that finally, most people were as lonely and bored as I was. In normal times, the great majority of people are happy. And you feel so alone being depressed. But for about a year, I wasn't alone.

Societal collapse is a nice fantasy. You're deluding yourself if you think it'd be an overall good. You wish for it because you envy the normal person's happiness, and you yourself have given up on ever being happy. So the only way left to deal with the envy to bring everyone else down to your level.

I saw a quote somewhere that what man fears most is not dying, but the world continuing on after he dies. That resonates with me. If the world ended, I'd be fine. But the idea of missing out on human history, of leaving my friends and family behind, that terrifies me.
 
i think anybody interested in societal collapse should definitely watch this video:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WPB2u8EzL8


it's a very very sober and logical look at what societies exactly are and the systems behind them, an in-depths look at the core moving parts of a structure like our society. it mostly all boils down to Energy Return On Investment, a system like our society must increase its Energy Return to grow, and during that growth it evolves complexities to more efficiently harvest that Energy Return and it's almost impossible to de-complexify. and the short and long of this video is that unless we develop cold fusion (or similar advancement in Energy Return) our society will totally collapse at the hands of resource depletion and over-complexification, it's simply inevitable. and the sooner it happens the more of our natural world can be saved. so hopefully "collapse", as communities around the internet call it (on >redditcostanzayeahrightsmirk /Collapseaware) happens sooner rather than later.


There's a thread dedicated to this video.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
Societal collapse is a nice fantasy. You're deluding yourself if you think it'd be an overall good. You wish for it because you envy the normal person's happiness, and you yourself have given up on ever being happy. So the only way left to deal with the envy to bring everyone else down to your level.
what was weird was, that 3 months before iirc (before it came to Slovakia), i felt shit and wished everyone else was too...
in retrospect, redditors tried to "call up" UFO/aliens "into reality"
so if most of people felt the same, and were in hate or some very strong, negative mood - could they , "we", "attracted" (The Secret, book) COVID?

but then, all we see then is, because people want war, "attracting it"?
ah, if it was this easy lol, to not move a finger - but too, abusing negative emotions, and using them in contrary ways even if wishes colud be noble...?
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
It all boils down to infinite growth of the economy against the finite resources of earth. Consumption is as high as it can be soo they can't increase the profits without taking from their workers and the product. It will go on until everything you own will crumble to dust in a week or the nature finally gives up trying to feed the monster of consumption.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

containercore

The Y2K bug was real, civilization ended in 1999
Joined
Dec 9, 2021
Messages
209
Reaction score
1,412
Awards
114
Website
youtu.be
Notice how everyone says the same joke about how 100 years ago, people imagined flying cars? The entire point of the joke is that compared to today, the people of the past were optimistic and imagined a brighter future, while our current people today see no hope, besides maybe a 1% increase in their wages.
It's funny how the modern day Car of the Future™ is something that looks like it was designed for post-apocalyptic urban warfare. Major selling points include its ability to withstand gunfire (provided no one aims through the window at the driver lol).
ZIOm1zT.png


A thoroughly pessimistic design for a paranoid low-trust society.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Chuffed

Traveler
Joined
Dec 13, 2023
Messages
145
Reaction score
279
Awards
49
I'll admit, they got me too (to some extent). I got into prepping and homesteading for the wrong reasons, and now I'm trying to flip that into a postive by being responsible with the yard (gardening and composting) and planning for the future (growing food). And to get real, everyone thinks they'll be the last ones standing when the zombies come, also 'zombies' is code word for humans you get to shoot because they're stealing your TV.
 
stealing your
or values
see americanization, westernization
global market came for us all...

/

rel. thread:

mildly, what goeson inside, probably:
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
Containment Chat
Rules Help Users
  • Member:
    SpheralBloom said:
    are u still mad at meeee? :JahyStare:
    No, I don't think I was mad to begin with
    Link
  • Member:
    I just exaggerated for comedic purposes
    +1
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    hes tsundere
    +1
    Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    Muah
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that its true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    Link
  • Link
  • Member:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that its true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    So you're more analytic
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    aristotle was right because he walked in robes and had a free willy
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    thats all i need to know
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    id say the distinction is nonsense
    Link
  • Member:
    Whatever, it's beyond my knowledge as an autodidactic apprentice
    Link
  • CosmoCit:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic.
    This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is concerned with truth being self-evident enough to prove it with simple thought, though I wouldn't call Aristotle or Hegel simple thinkers. It's an intuitive exercise as much as it is an analytical one.
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that it's true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    Link
  • Member:
    I think I got some of what you meant though
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    I suppose the core issue is that it creates a problem of unfalsifiability given the nebulous nature of the system. But it's worth pointing out that while logical rigor is important in mathematics or in, I don't know, nuclear physics, human beings forge the enormous, overwhelming majority of their beliefs either from appeal to authority ("experts say" or "this person I trust argued that", etc) or simply from induction based on personal experience and Bayesian updating of prior beliefs. There is the question of what is logically rigorous and then there is the question of what is useful to Man in understanding the world around him, and the two may not always have the same answers. That's not an endorsement of Hegel from me, simply an observation that I feel is often missed in these discussions.
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    CosmoCit said:
    This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is concerned with truth being self-evident enough to prove it with simple thought, though I wouldn't call Aristotle or Hegel simple thinkers. It's an intuitive exercise as much as it is an analytical one.
    i think primitive is more accurate than simple
    Link
  • Member:
    SophiaHaven said:
    I suppose the core issue is that it creates a problem of unfalsifiability given the nebulous nature of the system. But it's worth pointing out that while logical rigor is important in mathematics or in, I don't know, nuclear physics, human beings forge the enormous, overwhelming majority of their beliefs either from appeal to authority ("experts say" or "this person I trust argued that", etc) or simply from induction based on personal experience and Bayesian updating of prior beliefs. There is the question of what is logically rigorous and then there is the question of what is useful to Man in understanding the world around him, and the two may not always have the same answers. That's not an endorsement of Hegel from me, simply an observation that I feel is often missed in these discussions.
    This is why I hate calling concepts "Hegelian" or "Nietzschean", it makes it seem as though truth revolves around dead men
    +1
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    The following human resource of our competencies, and practices are now better able to understand the companies have changed, the full involvement - are practices. The following human resource of our future. We are viewed as a values is absolutely critical to achieve the companies: People is absolutely critical to achieve the company's employees are viewed as a values is absolutely critical to achieve the market. A company's companies: People have recognized that we would have a shared values is a key
    Link
  • Member:
    It also creates a false sense of evidence
    +1
    Link
  • CosmoCit:
    Still a Youth said:
    i think primitive is more accurate than simple
    It's like saying the wheel is primitive, or the column. Technically, yes, but so foundational that the basic shape is still in use today with little modification to its essential form.
    +1
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    People are viewed as a new meaning. To become a world-class company. Human resource systems, and new meaning. To become a world-class company will demand flexibility, cycle times have changed, the importance of competencies, and practiced by world-class company have changed, the importance - in quality, innovation, and productivity. Integrity is fundamental. People are practices are strategically importance of our compete in they needs, and engagement based marketplace on our future.
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    Member said:
    This is why I hate calling concepts "Hegelian" or "Nietzschean", it makes it seem as though truth revolves around dead men
    Can you elaborate on what you mean here?
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    A compete in the full involvement to improvement of every person in today's market. A companies: People have increased on a set of people is absolutely critical to achieve the compete in they needs, and practices are strategically importance of our company have recognized that efficiencies, and practiced by world-class levels of the marketplace on our future. We recognize that company's employees are viewed as a new meaning.
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    CosmoCit said:
    It's like saying the wheel is primitive, or the column. Technically, yes, but so foundational that the basic shape is still in use today with little modification to its essential form.
    yea thats what i mean. not simple in any way, just not as advanced
    Link
  • Link
      MindControlBoxer: @SophiaHaven thoughts