This is not a debate btw, it's just an opinion i wanted to share based on the results.
Is funny, i never saw nihilism this way, i always saw it as the lack of moral objectivity, i think there is a purpose in what we do, is just i don't believe in the authority of the construct, morality is set by the society to preserver our own integrity because no one wants to get killed, not because it has a deeper meaning, you can give it an spiritual rethoric if you want, but at the end of the day is just a bunch of stablished laws made for us to not descend into barbarism, this can be a clear example of how societies see themselves, Japan will never admit what happen in Nanjing, Americans will argue that the Sandy Creek Massacre was justified.
I don't know, moralism always seems like hypocrisy to me, because there are so few folks that can actually kept their own words and actually believe them, but then again is not something i really care, the test usually did gave you questions about moral ambiguity, and because my ideas of morality is that it just follows what society wants to follow to reassure and preserve itself, not because of a biological concept (besides the survival instinct of course), Society is our biggest safeguard and at the same time, collective tyrant.
So according to the Zarathustra and this test, criminals are the real übermensch.
View attachment 49739