nsequeira119
DNW Expert
The title says it all- what are some horrible movie or TV adaptations of books that are great? And I don't just mean the movie changes a few insignificant details- all movies have to do that somewhere- I mean they completely butcher the plot, massacre the characters, make the whole thing virtually unrecognizable to the reading audience. There are more adaptations like this than you might realize upon first inspection, so think your answers over a while.
I'll kick the thread off with 1999's "Breakfast of Champions," an adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's 1973 novel. I remember the first time I read Breakfast of Champions, it was one of the funniest books I ever read- it's hands down my favorite Kurt Vonnegut book, its observations about the human condition are really insightful and poignant, and the plot is enjoyable and captivating throughout. The characters are memorable, they all have great lines and exchanges, the imagery is fine-tuned in that way only Vonnegut is capable of.
The movie, on the other hand, is a pile of shit, because they have to cram all these extremely philosophical and nuanced ideas into 2 hours of filler, so what you get is the most basic iteration of the story possible, minus all the interesting musings, anecdotes, tidbits, and charm. It's hard for me to even believe this movie is real, because I don't know who the target audience would be. Kurt Vonnegut fans hate it, and to non-Kurt Vonnegut fans it's just nonsense. It's a stain on both Bruce Willis' and Nick Nolte's careers, and the poster looks Photoshopped. This looks like a joke movie that would be in the background of an SNL skit or something.
So yeah, that's my example. It's interesting how widely adaptations can vary- and I find it weird that certain books, like Lord Of The Rings, were ever considered "unadaptable" when their plots are very straightforward and image-oriented- a book like Breakfast of Champions is a much better example of a truly unadaptable book that only functions in literature form. I maintain that Slaughterhouse Five is the only good Vonnegut movie, and that's because Slaughterhouse Five is the only book of his that adheres even remotely to the traditional narrative structure.
Looking forward to whatever you come up with.
I'll kick the thread off with 1999's "Breakfast of Champions," an adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's 1973 novel. I remember the first time I read Breakfast of Champions, it was one of the funniest books I ever read- it's hands down my favorite Kurt Vonnegut book, its observations about the human condition are really insightful and poignant, and the plot is enjoyable and captivating throughout. The characters are memorable, they all have great lines and exchanges, the imagery is fine-tuned in that way only Vonnegut is capable of.
The movie, on the other hand, is a pile of shit, because they have to cram all these extremely philosophical and nuanced ideas into 2 hours of filler, so what you get is the most basic iteration of the story possible, minus all the interesting musings, anecdotes, tidbits, and charm. It's hard for me to even believe this movie is real, because I don't know who the target audience would be. Kurt Vonnegut fans hate it, and to non-Kurt Vonnegut fans it's just nonsense. It's a stain on both Bruce Willis' and Nick Nolte's careers, and the poster looks Photoshopped. This looks like a joke movie that would be in the background of an SNL skit or something.
So yeah, that's my example. It's interesting how widely adaptations can vary- and I find it weird that certain books, like Lord Of The Rings, were ever considered "unadaptable" when their plots are very straightforward and image-oriented- a book like Breakfast of Champions is a much better example of a truly unadaptable book that only functions in literature form. I maintain that Slaughterhouse Five is the only good Vonnegut movie, and that's because Slaughterhouse Five is the only book of his that adheres even remotely to the traditional narrative structure.
Looking forward to whatever you come up with.