RisingThumb's big book recommendation list

RisingThumb

Imaginary manifestation of fun
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
3,779
Awards
234
Website
risingthumb.xyz
The Big Book Recommendation list

I will break this down into primary reading, and further reading. Most of these follow the Western Canon.

1 - The Original Epic Poems
1.1. Reading: Homer, The Illiad. Homer, The Odyssey. Virgil, The Aeneid.
1.2. Extended Reading: C.S. Lewis, Preface to Paradise lost. Julian Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind.


These are the original epic poems. Epic poems, aren't always in rhyme, though some translations do it in a nice rhyme. I recommend these as they make a big backbone in the little stories inside of them. Often these little stories are taken by people like Euripides and converted into plays, like one of his better known ones, the Cyclops. Extended reading: On the narrative structure, I recommend C.S. Lewis Preface to Paradise Lost. Epic poetry is narrative, not lyrical- so it is often hard to understand or enjoy by most people today if you don't understand how to read it. It's not about the individual lines, but the "argument" which is what that poem says in that canto or book. I also recommend reading Julian Jaynes "The Origin of Consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind". This will explore psychologically what is meant by Gods "speaking to people", where it is actually down to the right hemisphere dealing with primal emotions, symbols and images, but the Corpus Callosum(the small bridge between the two hemispheres of the brain) wasn't evolved enough to deal with this sort of functionality.

2 - The Socratic Philosophy
2.1. Reading: Plato, The Symposium. Plato, The Republic.
2.2. Extended Reading: Plato, Apology, Crito, Phaedo. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, Secret of Secrets. Plutarch's lives, Alexander the Great


Original socratic dialogues on a number of topics. It helps to know what a socratic dialogue is and how it is done. As extended reading, Plato's other dialogues are worth reading. Aristotle is an excellent introduction to ethics and metaphysics, often invoked in Hellenistic philosophy(Greek philosophy). Secret of Secrets, is a mixture of philosophy, magic, astronomy, diet, and politics that was written for Alexander the Great whom Aristotle mentored. The Plutarch lives of Alexander the Great is an excellent overview of this, that isn't spoiled by "He was gay" and other recent historical revisionist ideas.

3 - The Stoic Philosophy
3.1. Reading: Epictetus, Enchiridion. Marcus Aurelius, Meditations.
3.2. Extended Reading: Epictetus, Discourses. Seneca, Letters from a Stoic. Huxley, Brave New World

It is worth mentioning, this section is about the 3 main offshoots of hellenistic philosophy, and how to lead a good life. Stoicism, Hedonism and Cynicism. The reading here covers the principle application of stoicism. I do not know of good books by the ancients on the topic of Hedonism, so the modern Brave New World will suffice for demonstrating this(showing not just what pleasure without pain does, but what function pain has in conditioning, and a number of psychological, social and politic themes). I do not know of any good books covering cynicism, so let it suffice to say, it's the Socratic quote "I know that I know nothing" taken to the extreme towards being cynical of everything. All 3 of these philosophies are engrained into our language as adverbs, "Hedonistic", "Cynical" and "Stoic", so understanding all 3 of these is important. I would argue Stoicism is the most prescriptive and useful to people. Hedonism and Cynicism should both be treated with caution, as the latter carries the burden of the Nietzschean idea of the Abyss, which will devour your will and affirmation to life if not untangled. Hedonism, if not treated as "maximising pleasure, minimising pain" will cause issues, as it's often seen as just maximising pleasures, ignoring the hangover of too much wine, or the overdose of too much drugs.

4 - Christianity
4.1. Reading: The Bible(Genesis, Proverbs, Psalms, The Gospel of St Matthew, Revelations).
4.2. Extended Reading: The Apocrypha. The Books of Enoch. The book of Jubilee. The other books of the bible. The book of common prayer. C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape letters, The Problem of Pain. The Torah, The


The reading books I have mentioned in the bible is because they are invoked everywhere. Genesis as the Christian Creation myth. Proverbs for its proverbs. Psalms for, as Luther puts it "The little bible". The Gospel of St. Matthew as the life of Jesus. Revelations as the apocalyptic literature for the Christians. Of the extended readings, it's important to know that the Apocrypha are non-canonical books which have their own errors and inconsistencies with The Bible, and the church picks and chooses what is invoked. For the two C.S. Lewis works, The Screwtape letters gives an idea of how to pervert people away from virtue, regardless of whether virtue is a Christian virtue or not. The Problem of pain tackles, exactly that. The Book of Common Prayer is also listed as it's referenced sparsely throughout Christian writings following its inception(along a similar time as the KJV bible). It should also be noted, C.S. Lewis' works also touch on the ideas of mere christianity, the unusual nature of different churches and sects.

5 - Eastern philosophy
5.1. Reading: The Bhagavadgita. Sun Tzu, The Art of War. Miyamoto Musashi, The Book of Five rings, Dokkodo.
5.2. Extended Reading: The Vedas. The Upanishads. The Mahabharata. Confuscious, Five Classics and Four books


It is worth noting, I have not read the extended reading for this, but their work is colossal as it covers the epic poetry of India(which affects Aristotlean thought slightly). The Bhagavadgita covers Indian philosophy well, the Art of War covers chinese philosophy well, and Musashi's works cover Japanese philosophy well. These have similar concepts to those found in Stoic philosophy, regarding conflict, but regarding the world, it takes a non-dualistic view of the world, which you'll not find in the West until Nietzsche(as the Bible brings out the dualistic the thoughts of Virtue and Sin).

6 - Medieval politics, poetry and understanding the world
6.1. Reading: Dante's Inferno. Milton, Paradise lost. Machiavelli, The Prince.
6.2. Extended Reading: Isidore of Seville, Etymology. C.S. Lewis preface to paradise lost. Dante's Divine Comedy


The Etymology will explain a lot of post-ancient thought without it being skewed from modernist commentary. It is also an excellent text for learning Latin as a beginner. Dante's Inferno, could be called a Gnostic text, or a Christian text as it draws upon ideas from the Apocrypha, like the idea of Purgatory(which is not a Christian idea).

7 - Esoteric, Hermetic and Gnostic thought

This covers Hermeticism. This section is intentionally left blank as I'm not educated enough on it. I have read some of Wouter J. Hanegraff, Western Esotericism, A guide for the perplexed, and the Corpus Hermeticum but my understanding of the Esoteric is incomplete.

8 - Medieval philosophy
8.1. Reading: Shakespeare, Hamlet, Julius Caesar. The Essays of Francis Bacon.
8.2. Extended Reading: ...


There are a lot of works in the medieval philosophy. Regarding the plays of Hamlet and Julius Caesar, they had a lot of ripples in references. The Essays of Francis Bacon, shows the growing (leftist and liberal ideas) towards constitutional monarchy. I have put a ... on the extended reading, as there's a huge amount, that is utterly inaccessible by the use of Latin, and because I generally haven't read from this period very much.

9 - Enlightenment philosophy and science
9.1. Reading: Voltaire, Candide or Optimism. Darwin, On the Origin of Species. Kierkegaard, Either/Or. Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
9.2. Extended Reading: Max Stirner, The Unique and its Property. Karl Marx, Das Kapital. Schopenhauer, The world as Will and Representation.


On the reading books, Candide or Optimism is an enjoyable tragicomedy on the random nature of the world, and how this world is not the best of all possible worlds(while also damning Christianity and a number of other ideas), it sits alongside the growing Prussian and German nationalist movements. Darwin's work is included as a scientific. . The extended reading books are less important works of Hegelian dialectics and its consequences, spiralling into the left-right, communist-fascist horseshoe theory messy soup of strangely worded dialectics designed to confuse readers. I have opted for Max Stirner and Karl Marx as the former is discrediting philosophy, and the latter tries to establish communist thought and also is very reactionary to Stirner. Kierkegaard's Either/Or shows how the dualism of living, either as the virtuous ethical... faithful man, or as the aesthetic man, and by metaphysics shows how you can't reason on any account towards either... or. Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals discusses the idea of the Categorical Imperative, and how most imperatives are of a hypotheitcal imperative form. Schopenhauer's world as will is an important text to understanding Nietzsche as Nietzsche adored him in his early work, and his later work is somewhat reactionary and condemning of Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer was also mocking in his time of Hegel(as was Max Stirner and the next generation of students after Hegel). Hegel was honestly the butt of jokes in the grand scheme, his dialectic was just another rhetoric(used by Nazis, Communists, and folks with an agenda).

10 - Nietzsche
10.1. Reading: Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Twilight of the Idols. Beyond Good and Evil.
10.2. Extended Reading: The Gay Science. The Birth of Tragedy. The Antichrist. The Will to Power, Ecce Homo, The Wagner Case. Richard Wagner, The Ring Cycle.


Before going into this, you will want to be comfortable with the following: a grasp on music, a good grasp of Christianity(AT LEAST having read the Gospel of St Matthew!). A grasp of germany at the time(Nibelungelied being the common mythology drawn upon, the german romanticist movement. How classical music is really the history of germanic music. The formation of the German state). You will also want to know your Greek and Roman mythology as he draws upon their pantheons. You will want to toss out any misconceptions of what the Übermensch is, as drawn up by WW2 and the Nazis. You will also want to know what communism is, what nationalism is, how they all draw from Hegelian Dialectics. The majority of Nietzsche's works are put as extended reading. Twilight of the Idols is a good intorduction on him. Beyond Good and Evil is his explosive ideas put into a powerful prose form. Thus Spoke Zarathustra is his explosive ideas put into a powerful poetic or storytelling form. You'll find Twilight of the Idols and Beyond Good and Evil are quoted from a lot due to their aphorisms. Thus Spoke Zarathustra is referenced a lot more so in its titles and events, as it tells a lot of parables instead. This makes it engaging even if you don't know all the work he draws upon. If you do, you have a very good idea what he's saying.

A warning on Nietzsche, he writes incredibly dense text. Picking up a secondhand student's copy will find the entire book is practically highlighted because of how much is insightful. It's exactly true what is said in Ecce Homo, that he says a book's worth of content in 10 lines, and says what many books cannot. His works relating more to music(Birth of Tragedy, Wagner Case), need a backing in what opera is, what music was like, how Beethoven was the peak of apollonian music, and following Wagner everything was more emotions and less musical structure(The Ninth legendarily features double fugues which are often difficult and very structured ideas to work upon, and often come out sounding like crap if done poorly. Bach did them well). Care should be taken reading The Will to Power and The Antichrist, they were published post-humously, and are likely subjects of editing by his sister and her boyfriend who were known anti-semites(unlike Nietzsche who was an anti-anti-semite as noted in letters damning Wagner).

A lot of stuff can be read out of order, but if you read Nietzsche without knowing the ancient philosophy, the ancient mythology, schopenhaur, and musical history and Christianity you will seriously struggle to understand him.

11 - Post-Nietzsche, Modern writings
11.1. Reading: Doestovsky, Brother's Karamazov, Crime and Punishment. Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus. George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-four. Carl Jung, The Red Book, Man and His Symbols, The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious. Theodore Kaczynski, Industrial Society and its future. Huxley, Brave New World. Thomas Carlyle, Heroes and Hero worship. Grimm's Folk tales. J.R.R. Tolkien, The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings. Mikhael Bulgakov, The Master and Margarita. Jules Verne, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea. Kafka, The Trial. F. Scott Fizgerald, The Great Gatsby. Aleister Crowley, The Equinox of the Gods. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf. Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Storm of Steel, Ernst Jünger.

Strictly speaking, some(quite a few by ~100 years) of these are before Nietzsche(Doestovsky) but the majority of these fall into the categories of building upon alchemy, building upon psychology, or building upon the abyss. I have not put any of this into extended reading, as following Nietzsche, it blooms into political philosophy, magic and esotericism, and psychology. Some of these are widely known, so I will skip discussing them. The Master and Margarita is a fascinating communist work, possibly best enjoyed alongside the Gulag Archipelago. Jules Verne's works are travellogues, but his work on 20,000 leagues under the sea(while dry and boring in some areas) is exceptional and speaks to our current world where we have many mysteries and a growing interest in magic, alchemy and the esoteric(atlantis). It also speaks into current crises, with well-reasoned terrorism. Alongisde that is Kaczynski's seminal work "Industrial Society and its Future", where you see first prophecies that have rung true to our current world. Jung's work is proto-psychology, that speaks a lot on the right hemisphere, active imagination, the nature of dreams, the nature of the unconscious and gnostic mysteries. Camus gives the absurdist perspective of how to deal with Nietzsche's Abyss. Thomas Carlyle, struck closely to what Julian Jaynes talks of in the Origin of Consciousness, but his lectures and other works talks a lot about human ideal, and where it originates(Gods, Prophets, Poets, Priests, Academics, Kings). All of these can be seen as "heavy drops from the gray cloud that mark the coming of the Übermensch" to paraphrase Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Grimm's Folk tales speaks of germanic stories often heard in the west. Crowley's Equinox of the Gods, fits in here, as his Divine Law "Do What Thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" follows naturally from the the Nietzschean abyss. A cautious reading of Mein Kampf, under similar warnings about communist readings using Hegelian Dialectics as it produces anti-semites. Protocols of the Elders of Zion, is similarly anti-semitic, but has an unknown author and follows in the growing Russian and German antisemitism of the time. Anti-semitism is a curious topic, and in some ways, given the hypocrisies between the Old Testament, and the Oral Torah and the Talmud. It is understandable how antisemitism arises, when you look at the treatment of gentiles-- even more so antizionism, the nationalist Jews crusading for Jerusalem... Israel under U.S. Tax Dollars and Nazi German Marks(Haavara Agreement). The work Storm of Steel is a WW1 text that doesn't treat the war entirely as the worst thing that happened, but gives an interesting philosophical account of the war from a man who lived in it. Who understood best, arguably, what it meant to be a German.



Final Note. Some of these works you will already be familiar with, not from reading them, but from performances of them. Some of these are better seen as performances than read. I.E. Anything opera(Wagner) or theatre(Hamlet, Julius Caesar) or even plain tragedy/satyr/comedy (Plays of Euripedes like Cyclops). It may cost a bit, but if your local opera house, or theatre is doing performances of these, it is highly advised to watch it. Those works were never intended to be only read, but also enjoyed a visiual-audio spectacle. I guarantee, the first opera you see will be a spectacle that will leave you speechless and astonished.

Pinging @Hadrian Hardrada Cicero as he requested this big list. Apologies for any spelling and grammar errors, if I had more time, I'd correct them. I tried to give an overview of why particular primary texts are chosen, and why particular extended reading is chosen, but I got pretty lazy towards the end. On Medieval texts and on Esoteric texts, do leave what you would recommend as reading there! I'm curious myself what from that period of time(250 AD-1600AD) are highly recommended reading. Also apologies for messed up editing, I wrote it as a text file, and copied and pasted and made minor formatting changes.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
Thanks man, you're the best!
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Eden

Did You Get My Message?
Bronze
Joined
Feb 26, 2023
Messages
428
Reaction score
1,352
Awards
145
Website
foreverliketh.is
Based. I wanna throw the Tao Te Ching in here.

ttc.tasuki.org

Standard Ebooks Version

The Wisdom of Laotse

There's a lot of translations regarding it. Different approaches and styles that can be taken with it.

What is it? What do you get from it? How do you understand it?

It's about things and not about things. Their nature, their essence? It's about understanding, and not understanding. Knowing and not knowing. It's about the way, the flow, the Tao. I can't explain it, but it's possible to get it. Just remember not to, too.

I sound retarded.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

№56

Self-Hating Bureaucrat
Moderator
Gold
Joined
Mar 27, 2022
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
7,672
Awards
270
Website
no56.neocities.org
Don't have anything to add to this other than that I've recently read John Ciardi's English translation of the Divine Comedy and am currently partway through Richmond Lattimore's English translation of the Iliad/Odyssey and can recommend both of them. It's usually a waste of time to worry about which translation of a non-English work to read, but both of those poems have been translated so many times that choosing one can be hard. Thomas Carlyle is great. The Master and Margarita is good but it's kind of hard to understand unless you've already read Goethe's Faust (which also deserves to be on this list) and know Russian history. P. Craig Russel's comic book adaptation of the Ring Cycle is also the best production of Wagner I've seen and I don't care if that makes me a pleb.
I also think that a big reading list like this can be intimidating. Personally, my advice to someone who doesn't feel like they're well-read enough would be to pick any book that seems interesting, read it, pay attention to any interesting ideas or concepts that come up, and then pick the next thing you read based of whatever interested you. It could be a direct citation to another book or just the urge to read more books from ancient Greece, or about pirates, or whatever. If you do that for a long enough period of time (and you're careful to avoid bad or pointless books) eventually you'll be able to write a list of your own that's as thorough as this one. It's a great idea to start with something at the top of this list, but don't be surprised if you end up somewhere totally different.
Thomas Carlyle said:
"As to the books which you—whom I know so little of—should read, there is hardly anything definite that can be said. For one thing, you may be strenuously advised to keep reading. Any good book, any book that is wiser than yourself, will teach you something—a great many things, indirectly and directly, if your mind be open to learn. This old counsel of Johnson's is also good, and universally applicable:—'Read the book you do honestly feel a wish and curiosity to read.' The very wish and curiosity indicates that you, then and there, are the person likely to get good of it. 'Our wishes are presentiments of our capabilities;' that is a noble saying, of deep encouragement to all true men; applicable to our wishes and efforts in regard to reading as to other things. Among all the objects that look wonderful or beautiful to you, follow with fresh hope the one which looks wonderfullest, beautifullest. You will gradually find, by various trials (which trials see that you make honest, manful ones, not silly, short, fitful ones), what is for you the wonderfullest, beautifullest—what is your true element and province, and be able to profit by that. True desire, the monition of nature, is much to be attended to. But here, also, you are to discriminate carefully between true desire and false. The medical men tell us we should eat what we truly have an appetite for; but what we only falsely have an appetite for we should resolutely avoid. It is very true; and flimsy, desultory readers, who fly from foolish book to foolish book, and get good of none, and mischief of all—are not these as foolish, unhealthy eaters, who mistake their superficial false desire after spiceries and confectioneries for their real appetite, of which even they are not destitute, though it lies far deeper, far quieter, after solid nutritive food? With these illustrations, I will recommend Johnson's advice to you."
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

RisingThumb

Imaginary manifestation of fun
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
3,779
Awards
234
Website
risingthumb.xyz
Don't have anything to add to this other than that I've recently read John Ciardi's English translation of the Divine Comedy and am currently partway through Richmond Lattimore's English translation of the Iliad/Odyssey and can recommend both of them. It's usually a waste of time to worry about which translation of a non-English work to read, but both of those poems have been translated so many times that choosing one can be hard. Thomas Carlyle is great. The Master and Margarita is good but it's kind of hard to understand unless you've already read Goethe's Faust (which also deserves to be on this list) and know Russian history. P. Craig Russel's comic book adaptation of the Ring Cycle is also the best production of Wagner I've seen and I don't care if that makes me a pleb.
If it's poetry, it's not a waste. Look for one that keeps the same or similar poetic structure and form as the original. For Dante's Allegory as an example, you find loads of translations that are in ABAB form and not ABABCB form. If they are a pure translation, and don't try to keep the poetic part of the translation it breaks. For works heavily reliant upon humour, sarcasm or irony, you have to be careful with translating it right(German does this a lot, Apart from with the British, sarcasm and irony is rarely employed in English texts so most readers don't get it). For all other prose, any translation is usually fine(but some things have a particularly interpretation they try to dig at a lot with their translation).
Goethe's Faust
Good shout. To be honest, a lot of stuff on this list is borderline between play, opera, theatre and text. German works like Faust should probably be added. It's understandable why, a good opera needs a good libretto that can be converted nicely to music. Didn't know about P Craig Russel's comic adaptaion of the ring cycle. I'll need to check that out, it sounds fucking sick! I've been enjoying Wagner's other works like the Flying Dutchman recently
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
4 - Christianity
4.1. Reading: The Bible(Genesis, Proverbs, Psalms, The Gospel of St Matthew, Revelations).
4.2. Extended Reading: The Apocrypha. The Books of Enoch. The book of Jubilee. The other books of the bible. The book of common prayer. C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape letters, The Problem of Pain. The Torah, The
This is a pretty decent list, though I would add a couple of things:

Revelation is singular. And The Torah contains Genesis already. I also wouldn't pay too much attention to the Apocrypha (which also includes the different books of Enoch) since those books are excluded for not being divinely inspired and were more like fanfics written at the time. They don't do anything to further one's understanding of Christianity or its principles. Though the oldest book of Enoch has probably the first instance of someone describing what would be essentially noclipping through reality which is interesting

I would add the book of Luke to this as well. Luke 16 uniquely tells the story of the rich man and Lazarus (not the same Lazarus that Jesus raised from the dead). This story underlines the idea that things which are highly esteemed among men are abomination in the sight of God

The book of Job would be worth reading early too since it's a microcosm of the Christian faith

Beyond those, it is important to understand the translation differences, so I would first recommend reading one of these (they all basically have the same message and a lot of the same general info). Basically, the most popular modern versions of The Bible have been deliberately changed to mislead Christians, so it's important to understand which changes to watch out for and why they are a problem:
Then finally, I would recommend cross-referencing other versions to see where they differ or to get a better understanding of some of the more obscure topics. I typically read in the KJV, but reference the Greek texts (specifically for the New Testament), then occasionally the Douay-Rheims Bible (pre-Challoner revision since it preserves Old English, which has more historical interest than religious specifically) and The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures since their translations are generally good, though I still take it with a grain of salt
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

RisingThumb

Imaginary manifestation of fun
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
3,779
Awards
234
Website
risingthumb.xyz
Apocrypha (which also includes the different books of Enoch) since those books are excluded for not being divinely inspired and were more like fanfics written at the time
You raise me fanfics not being divinely inspired, and I'll raise you "how do you define divinely inspired"? Enochs 1 is quoted in New Testament scripture. Parts of it have historical errors which can easily discount it.
The book of Job would be worth reading early too since it's a microcosm of the Christian faith
I agree. I forgot about this, I mention Job occasionally, as it makes points that hurt Christian apologists and theologians. This is especially useful, alongside the Abraham sacrifice of isaac story
They don't do anything to further one's understanding of Christianity or its principles.
Agreed, they don't- but they further one's understanding of gnosticism in general. I would consider apocryphal texts to be like that. If you have any interest in magic, purgatory etc(which make foundations for Dante's Divine Comedy) they're useful texts
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
You raise me fanfics not being divinely inspired, and I'll raise you "how do you define divinely inspired"? Enochs 1 is quoted in New Testament scripture. Parts of it have historical errors which can easily discount it.
As far as I know, the Book of Enoch that was mentioned in The Bible may not have survived. The ones that were found later were either partly copied from whatever it may have been or wholly invented. But it's regarded as not being divinely inspired because what it describes does not fit in with the rest of The Bible and contradicts historical events

I found a copy of The Books of Enoch: Complete Edition a couple of years ago and it is interesting, though fantastical. It has more to do with the idea of the firmament and what goes on beyond it than anything else (or at least one of the versions does)
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Steingar

Traveler
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
105
Reaction score
229
Awards
44
Based. I wanna throw the Tao Te Ching in here.

ttc.tasuki.org

Standard Ebooks Version

The Wisdom of Laotse

There's a lot of translations regarding it. Different approaches and styles that can be taken with it.

What is it? What do you get from it? How do you understand it?

It's about things and not about things. Their nature, their essence? It's about understanding, and not understanding. Knowing and not knowing. It's about the way, the flow, the Tao. I can't explain it, but it's possible to get it. Just remember not to, too.

I sound retarded.
My dude, as someone who is big into Taoism it's heartening to see you recommend these, even though they are definitely not part of the Western canon haha.

My personal recommendation is to skip over going too deep into the Tao Te Ching and go straight to the Book of Zhuangzi. The Tao Te Ching is extremely abstract and more dedicated towards a ruler's philosophy on applying the Tao, whereas the Book of Zhuangzi tends to use parables much more extensively to spell out it's meaning and is primarily dedicated to a personal philsosphy of the Tao. It's also a very funny book in general.

Since the books sort of rhyme with each other it's also a good idea to read Zhuangzi first and then use that as a foundation to explore the Tao Te Ching in more detail since it gives good context.

I'm thinking of making a post about this and some other writings on the lit board some time later, watch that space.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

RisingThumb

Imaginary manifestation of fun
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
3,779
Awards
234
Website
risingthumb.xyz
I still feel bad for throwing a motherfugging Eastern book in a Western book list so I revive this in penance.
My fave Western reading on Eastern:
It's a Western-primary reading list because I am a westerner and have been influenced most by the Western Canon as probably most-other people in this thread. East Russian, Indian, Japanese, Chinese and Southeast-Asian texts are different. It's probably their difference and their novelty that draws in a lot of western readers, and whether this novelty is good or bad I don't know... it's certainly cloudy. I'm sure we've seen the meme of people looking up Buddhism on wikipedia and claiming to be a Buddhist. As two examples of this, Nietzsche's ideas of Amor Fati and the eternal recurrence have definite parallels to the point that I think eastern thought may have clouded his judgement of it and on metaphysics since he discards a lot of the metaphysical either in spite of Wagner, in spite of Schopenhaur or in spite of the direction of Germany under the dominance of Christianity... but it should be noted that despite Nietzsche having these Eastern texts in his library he didn't visit and experience the Asian countries in his travelling so he didn't see how they are even more dominated by the notions of herd. I'm not saying Eastern texts are bad, but that Western Authors often fail to give them the adequate scepticism that they give in surplus to their home texts, and often give them a free pass when they draw the same criticisms to religions like Christianity. What I am saying is that their novelty can cloud people's minds. Perhaps this is a warning also to myself that I feel clouded and that experience travelling the east can act as a good foglight to clear the mist that these works leave. People view Western texts in the context of their canon and western society(which Nietzsche travelling around Europe could see very well) and often ignore that the Eastern texts fit into their own canon and own society(that a lot of impressionable people can fall into). One of the most common examples of this, is Anime fans as Anime rarely draws reality nowadays and breeds Japanophiles who will be disappointed when(IF! For most stay in fantasy within their basements!) they visit Japan.

As an example, I've read the Bhagavadgita, but outside of the experience of India/Pakistan and the surrounding society, faith and culture, the ideas it puts forward are just another cloud I can't properly grasp(not that I don't understand dualism and how it can contrast against Western ideas, but I don't understand it strongly within its cultural context). This is also probably why the notion of "Different systems work best for different people" is so offensive to both Westerners and Easterners and all the different branches within them, as it dismisses both from being a "best" system that idealogues love

TL;DR, don't feel bad about adding eastern books, but keep in mind most people will read them and abuse their ideas outside of culture and context and contrast them against the Western canon within its culture and context.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards