Television Classics - Home Movies

Ixion_SEROV

Aesthetics Uber Alles - Digital Odysseus
Joined
May 25, 2021
Messages
42
Reaction score
130
Awards
40
Some time ago, I started making my way through shows I recall from my childhood as background noise while busy with other tasks. One of these shows is one which I had never properly formulated an opinion of due to how little I'd seen it in its heyday- Home Movies.

For those not in the know, Home Movies was one of the first great flagships to ever air on Adult Swim- the other being Space Ghost: Coast to Coast. Having originally aired on the much-maligned channel UPN, it would be picked up by Adult Swim and given new life in the form of a formal 4-season run, beginning in 1999 and ending in 2003. What amazes me about it- however- is how it has seemingly slipped through the cracks of television memory. While it's role in making Adult Swim what it is today is no doubt important, it would be overshadowed by later entries in the block- like Aqua Teen Hunger Force, Sealab 2021, Morel Orel, Metlocalypse, and Robot Chicken.

I would say that the most apt comparison would be 'Home Movies is to Robot Chicken as Rugrats is to Spongebob.'

For those who haven't seen it, I recommend giving it a try. Season 1 is the infamous "Squigglevision" season, and the show becomes more mature/engaging as it goes on. I'll admit that it's not as funny as shows like Xavier: Renegade Angel, Tigtone, or Superjail, but it has its moments and has its own unique energy. My only complaint about the show is its "music."
 

Attachments

  • Home Movies Thumbnail.jpg
    Home Movies Thumbnail.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 75
Virtual Cafe Awards
Containment Chat
Rules Help Users
  • handoferis:
    i had a roll of those back in the early internet days
    Link
  • Link
  • handoferis:
    would go to the supermarket and put them on packs of sausages
    +4
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    SpheralBloom said:
    Do it do it do it X3
    Lol, I don't actually have a joke prepared; I'm not good at humor. I'm just referencing how Baudelaire referred to the orgasm as "the little death" because... he was French, and therefore mentally handicapped or something.
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    handoferis said:
    just got reminded of those "for anal use ONLY" stickers. I would go to the supermarket and put them on packs of sausages
    ALL HAIL
    Link
  • Member:
    SpheralBloom said:
    Remember, sleep is just death being shy <3
    What's he scared about, I'm right here
    Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    SophiaHaven said:
    Lol, I don't actually have a joke prepared; I'm not good at humor. I'm just referencing how Baudelaire referred to the orgasm as "the little death" because... he was French, and therefore mentally handicapped or something.
    pffftttt that's a fitting name cus geno said it felt like his soul was being sucked out
    Link
  • Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    Member said:
    What's he scared about, I'm right here
    are u still mad at meeee? :JahyStare:
    Link
  • Member:
    SpheralBloom said:
    are u still mad at meeee? :JahyStare:
    No, I don't think I was mad to begin with
    Link
  • Member:
    I just exaggerated for comedic purposes
    +1
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    hes tsundere
    +1
    Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    Muah
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that its true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    Link
  • Link
  • Member:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that its true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    So you're more analytic
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    aristotle was right because he walked in robes and had a free willy
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    thats all i need to know
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    id say the distinction is nonsense
    Link
  • Member:
    Whatever, it's beyond my knowledge as an autodidactic apprentice
    Link
  • CosmoCit:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic.
    This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is concerned with truth being self-evident enough to prove it with simple thought, though I wouldn't call Aristotle or Hegel simple thinkers. It's an intuitive exercise as much as it is an analytical one.
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that it's true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    Link
  • Member:
    I think I got some of what you meant though
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    I suppose the core issue is that it creates a problem of unfalsifiability given the nebulous nature of the system. But it's worth pointing out that while logical rigor is important in mathematics or in, I don't know, nuclear physics, human beings forge the enormous, overwhelming majority of their beliefs either from appeal to authority ("experts say" or "this person I trust argued that", etc) or simply from induction based on personal experience and Bayesian updating of prior beliefs. There is the question of what is logically rigorous and then there is the question of what is useful to Man in understanding the world around him, and the two may not always have the same answers. That's not an endorsement of Hegel from me, simply an observation that I feel is often missed in these discussions.
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    CosmoCit said:
    This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is concerned with truth being self-evident enough to prove it with simple thought, though I wouldn't call Aristotle or Hegel simple thinkers. It's an intuitive exercise as much as it is an analytical one.
    i think primitive is more accurate than simple
    Link
      Still a Youth: This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is...