vech_08
Traveler
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 109
- Awards
- 17
I am sure that what I am about to tell you has happened to more than one of you, I am sure that more than one of you saw the "reject modernity, embrace tradition" meme. If I'm not being specific enough, I'm talking about those memes where the wojack nordic is shown as a traditional man, who is christian, lives in the country, rejects and hates today's society and criticizes things that for him are terrible (pornhub, games, junk food, promiscuity and to summarize, he abhors the consumerism that society promotes), has a family and children who like him, have a traditional and conservative mentality, living in the country and act as if they were in the 50s.
And speaking of the 50's, is it just me or is the 50's being idealized? The 50's are shown as a time when there were real values, when we didn't have the problems we have now, being a much better time to live and above all, not having to deal with the crap that the internet throws at us today such as: the problem of incels and femcels, that our generation does not know if they are men or women or whatever they put in your head in schools and universities, the political extremisms of left and right and above all, not to feel empty, that your life does have a purpose and it is beautiful.
Leaving aside the long introduction on a meme you already know, there's something that I always call the attention of that meme. That they sell it to you as the new rebellion, that now the rebellious being means having a family and children in the countryside and living like in the 1950s, that those conservative Christians who show up as chads with so to speak, "today's new punks," but is it really so?, there's some truth in their speech or is it just a meme and already?.
I'd like to know what you think in this forum about the subject, but if you ask me, I have some other doubt I want to say.
I always call it the attention that they put Christianity as the most "chad" that can be, while they put you to atheism as something very pathetic, pitiful, stupid and ultimately, as the "virgin" in the meme. Sometimes it gives the impression of being a meme of "The Virgin Atheist VS The Chad Christian." I can understand why they do so because of the horrendous fashion of being an intellectually arrogant atheist of >reddit
years ago and apparently there are still people like that. But I'm called by the attention they make the Christian chad as someone invulnerable to any addiction either: porn addiction, junk food, vapes, etc. As if having faith was some kind of "anti-vice shield" and nothing affects them, from experience, I know people very believing in real life (and are not few) and yet have some bad vice to fight with, like alcohol or spend hours in tik tok. This is what I mean when I say they show faith as a perfect anti-vice shield. I'm not saying that faith can't help you overcome your problems in life, it just seems a little exaggerated to me the way so glorified that they show you faith in the most conservative parts of the InternetContinuing with the previous point. I'm struck by how people are shown in a way that you only have 2 options, I explain. They show you a Wojack Coomer or a Wojak Doomer with all the vices that a person can have in today's society such as being addicted to porn, video games, junk food, vapes, among others. That the one who plays "The Virgin" (so to speak) is always an atheist or at the very least, someone who has trouble having faith and ends up ruined with his life. While the person who plays "The Chad" is the opposite, that is, with a Christian and conservative mentality, invulnerable to all the problems of today's world (that is, what I described before). But are we really that basic?, is it really not possible that there are nuances between both options?, because from experience, the believing people I know in my real life (I'm talking about family and very loving friends) are neither one nor the other, they have a bit of both extremes.
They can have faith in Christ but not have vices, they can practice a sport but that is why enjoy video games without it becoming a vice or controlling their lives, they can have a traditional and stable family with a wife and children but that does not mean that they are fit or have muscles or go to the gym, they may not be interested in porn or go to the promiscuity that the most conservative community criticizes so much, but that does not mean that they refuse to have a girlfriend to be intimate, much less seek to be ascetics, as happens to incels or the MGTOW community. What I mean is that in my experience people are not usually as they are seen in the memes of "reject modernity, embrace tradition", I can understand why they think that way because like them, I understand that feeling of disgust to today's society (but that's a topic for another thread) but real life looks much more complex than it seems. What do you think of all this?
And speaking of the 50's, is it just me or is the 50's being idealized? The 50's are shown as a time when there were real values, when we didn't have the problems we have now, being a much better time to live and above all, not having to deal with the crap that the internet throws at us today such as: the problem of incels and femcels, that our generation does not know if they are men or women or whatever they put in your head in schools and universities, the political extremisms of left and right and above all, not to feel empty, that your life does have a purpose and it is beautiful.
Leaving aside the long introduction on a meme you already know, there's something that I always call the attention of that meme. That they sell it to you as the new rebellion, that now the rebellious being means having a family and children in the countryside and living like in the 1950s, that those conservative Christians who show up as chads with so to speak, "today's new punks," but is it really so?, there's some truth in their speech or is it just a meme and already?.
I'd like to know what you think in this forum about the subject, but if you ask me, I have some other doubt I want to say.
I always call it the attention that they put Christianity as the most "chad" that can be, while they put you to atheism as something very pathetic, pitiful, stupid and ultimately, as the "virgin" in the meme. Sometimes it gives the impression of being a meme of "The Virgin Atheist VS The Chad Christian." I can understand why they do so because of the horrendous fashion of being an intellectually arrogant atheist of >reddit

They can have faith in Christ but not have vices, they can practice a sport but that is why enjoy video games without it becoming a vice or controlling their lives, they can have a traditional and stable family with a wife and children but that does not mean that they are fit or have muscles or go to the gym, they may not be interested in porn or go to the promiscuity that the most conservative community criticizes so much, but that does not mean that they refuse to have a girlfriend to be intimate, much less seek to be ascetics, as happens to incels or the MGTOW community. What I mean is that in my experience people are not usually as they are seen in the memes of "reject modernity, embrace tradition", I can understand why they think that way because like them, I understand that feeling of disgust to today's society (but that's a topic for another thread) but real life looks much more complex than it seems. What do you think of all this?