What things would you like the next Zelda game to have?

elia925-6

Well-Known Traveler
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
1,808
Awards
191
TOTK is came out two months ago after months and years of anticipation and hype. I completed the main quest(Please avoid game spoilers) and i enjoy it even though i got bored of it after discovering the 90% percent of the game. Despite the praise from big gaming sites the game got received, there are problems like:
1) The story didn't have a connection to BOTW. It felt more like some retelling than sequel. Like what happened to the whole sheikah technology.
2) The sky island variety was lackluster and not that interesting. Same with underworld. It has huge potential for amazing dungeons. At least it has different bosses than we got in botw
3) Most of the shrines were easy and some others only to get from some treasure chest an object you already own.
4) You couldn't carry the items and dlc costumes to the game from botw, outside of horses and some photo of Champions ballad. And recollect them without the extra abilities making it more exchausting.
5) Still lacking enemy variety especially robots and some flying monsters(Gleeoks were a good start). I hate blocky thing because it reminds me of the bowser from mario party ds and the fighting was identical regardless of the dificulty. For a game about sky and ancient scifi stuff, it feels sad.
6) Lack of zonai parts like solar panels which it works in the context of the game, providing extra life to the construct.
7) Mineru's backstory was wasted. They could make a second arc covering zonai stuff like what happened to them.

What i want from next zelda game:
* Weapon and shield crafting. Like collecting metals. Not the fusing thing
* Meaningful sidequests and not collecting some rare ingredients to give you some rupees
* No memories collecting. Just give a story happening right now. For creative stories, i rely on indie games.
* Not that korok shit. I found it boring especially to bring that korok closer to other.
* (Random request)Indian/southern asian psychedelic inspired world. I don't want to associate the series with some generic european medieval stuff. I liked the obscure ancient civilizations inspirations. One thing the series got right.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

Ardea

Active Traveler
Joined
May 12, 2022
Messages
189
Reaction score
455
Awards
73
Haven't played since Twilight Princess. I quite liked the boats in Wind Waker. Those might have been in subsequent games for all I know. I just liked the general aesthetic and atmosphere of Wind Waker a lot. When it first came out the in-game world really felt endless in a way.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards

elia925-6

Well-Known Traveler
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
1,808
Awards
191
I personally want to revisit the idea of dystopian future(which is all the range in video games) the series was aimed for and it didn't happend due to technical limitations. No i don't include ancient technology stuff. Evoland 2 did something like this with the graphics history and eras(Early-Medieval?, Medieval, Steampunk). Remember triforce chip? It would spice up the things more.
 
Virtual Cafe Awards
Containment Chat
Rules Help Users
  • SophiaHaven:
    handoferis said:
    just got reminded of those "for anal use ONLY" stickers. I would go to the supermarket and put them on packs of sausages
    ALL HAIL
    Link
  • Member:
    SpheralBloom said:
    Remember, sleep is just death being shy <3
    What's he scared about, I'm right here
    Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    SophiaHaven said:
    Lol, I don't actually have a joke prepared; I'm not good at humor. I'm just referencing how Baudelaire referred to the orgasm as "the little death" because... he was French, and therefore mentally handicapped or something.
    pffftttt that's a fitting name cus geno said it felt like his soul was being sucked out
    Link
  • Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    Member said:
    What's he scared about, I'm right here
    are u still mad at meeee? :JahyStare:
    Link
  • Member:
    SpheralBloom said:
    are u still mad at meeee? :JahyStare:
    No, I don't think I was mad to begin with
    Link
  • Member:
    I just exaggerated for comedic purposes
    +1
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    hes tsundere
    +1
    Link
  • SpheralBloom:
    Muah
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that its true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    Link
  • Link
  • Member:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that its true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    So you're more analytic
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    aristotle was right because he walked in robes and had a free willy
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    thats all i need to know
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    id say the distinction is nonsense
    Link
  • Member:
    Whatever, it's beyond my knowledge as an autodidactic apprentice
    Link
  • CosmoCit:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic.
    This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is concerned with truth being self-evident enough to prove it with simple thought, though I wouldn't call Aristotle or Hegel simple thinkers. It's an intuitive exercise as much as it is an analytical one.
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    Still a Youth said:
    Logic as a discipline has developed A LOT since aristotle developed the syllogism. basibally, logic used to be "if it follows these rules, then its true" but since Boole, but more importantly Frege and Russell, logic has become more or less a mathematical topic. In math, you gotts sit doen with yoyr statement and proove that it's true using theorems and reasoning by reference to rules. Hegels logic on the other hand has a more mystical bent (not exactly mystical, but vauge enough to where the term fits). Logic for hegel is much more about a vague sense of the flow of reason in the develoent of historical time. It sounds really cool and nice and deep, but the more you dig into it, and try to put it in toyr own words, the less sense it makes).
    Link
  • Member:
    I think I got some of what you meant though
    Link
  • SophiaHaven:
    I suppose the core issue is that it creates a problem of unfalsifiability given the nebulous nature of the system. But it's worth pointing out that while logical rigor is important in mathematics or in, I don't know, nuclear physics, human beings forge the enormous, overwhelming majority of their beliefs either from appeal to authority ("experts say" or "this person I trust argued that", etc) or simply from induction based on personal experience and Bayesian updating of prior beliefs. There is the question of what is logically rigorous and then there is the question of what is useful to Man in understanding the world around him, and the two may not always have the same answers. That's not an endorsement of Hegel from me, simply an observation that I feel is often missed in these discussions.
    Link
  • Still a Youth:
    CosmoCit said:
    This is a really good point and well-put. I just think it's missing that a lot of philosophy is concerned with truth being self-evident enough to prove it with simple thought, though I wouldn't call Aristotle or Hegel simple thinkers. It's an intuitive exercise as much as it is an analytical one.
    i think primitive is more accurate than simple
    Link
  • Member:
    SophiaHaven said:
    I suppose the core issue is that it creates a problem of unfalsifiability given the nebulous nature of the system. But it's worth pointing out that while logical rigor is important in mathematics or in, I don't know, nuclear physics, human beings forge the enormous, overwhelming majority of their beliefs either from appeal to authority ("experts say" or "this person I trust argued that", etc) or simply from induction based on personal experience and Bayesian updating of prior beliefs. There is the question of what is logically rigorous and then there is the question of what is useful to Man in understanding the world around him, and the two may not always have the same answers. That's not an endorsement of Hegel from me, simply an observation that I feel is often missed in these discussions.
    This is why I hate calling concepts "Hegelian" or "Nietzschean", it makes it seem as though truth revolves around dead men
    +1
    Link
  • MindControlBoxer:
    The following human resource of our competencies, and practices are now better able to understand the companies have changed, the full involvement - are practices. The following human resource of our future. We are viewed as a values is absolutely critical to achieve the companies: People is absolutely critical to achieve the company's employees are viewed as a values is absolutely critical to achieve the market. A company's companies: People have recognized that we would have a shared values is a key
    Link
  • Member:
    It also creates a false sense of evidence
    Link
  • CosmoCit:
    Still a Youth said:
    i think primitive is more accurate than simple
    It's like saying the wheel is primitive, or the column. Technically, yes, but so foundational that the basic shape is still in use today with little modification to its essential form.
    +1
    Link
      CosmoCit: i think primitive is more accurate than simple It's like saying the wheel is primitive, or the... +1