nagolbud
Political correctness is thought control!
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 712
- Awards
- 169
This thread has been viewed 2869 times.
A joke clause in an amazon terms of service... a film about cell phone zombies that came out in 2016 which was also the same time 5g was developed (ignoring the original book came out in 2006 but whatever)... and scientists mind controlling mice...
truly convincing stuff. we're through the looking glass here people
fuck, you got me there. I do say a lot of things because it's funny. A good theory should be resilient enough to these half-assed attacks though, at least.Or maybe you're just another larping ****** with nothing to say so you attack others in hopes of gaining some narcissistic supply because your life is miserable asf.
fuck, you got me there. I do say a lot of things because it's funny. A good theory should be resilient enough to these half-assed attacks though, at least.
I think the real psyop all along is the self promo that you're pulling. Nice job man.
Right, sorry if you thought I was calling you a shill. I was just being cheeky because you shared your own video.I don't give a fuck about likes, subs, status or promo. I have my life outside of the internet and would happily walk away from it. In the last 7 years I've made less than 100 dollars off my content. Never has been about money or getting popular.
No jokes allowed in legally binding documents. Absolute, contradiction of purpose, and legality.A joke clause in an amazon terms of service... a film about cell phone zombies that came out in 2016 which was also the same time 5g was developed (ignoring the original book came out in 2006 but whatever)... and scientists mind controlling mice...
truly convincing stuff. we're through the looking glass here people
How was this myth deconstructed? What is the evidence that government classified technical capability, is even able to be accurately assessed, by those fundamentally, institutionally and legally not even allowed be informed of it? Let alone interact with or test any of it. Or, even view documents discussing it, or related to it in any way at all? (Yes, the same can be applied to the pro claims. Not my point.)Its a myth that the government is always currentYear+ X years ahead of everything. Last time I saw that particular line trotted out it was 300 years ahead.
If the government is so ahead where are the hypersonic weapons? China is ahead son. I think the dark winter references a possible conflict with China over Taiwan. Hence the dark winter from nuclear weaponry.
well OK, legally it's only a joke if the situation does happen and they fail to uphold the clause. but there's no real rule about having specific conditions that will never ever happen (see all the laws we have about colonizing space, for example), nor does it being in there mean that they're planning specifically to do it, or know that they will.No jokes allowed in legally binding documents. Absolute, contradiction of purpose, and legality.
Amazon either committed a self nullifying, crime of frivolity, or they meant it.
one thing that conspiracy nuts rarely bring up but is key to all their beliefs is that the new world order, or illuminati, or lizard people, or whichever secret overlords you believe in, have an absolute obsession with theatrics and irony. That they treat everything as a game and that's why they'll hide secret messages via numerology or whatever. Somehow every single one of their secret plans is set up exactly like a puzzle or ARG to be solved by anyone who looks long enough, and they either aren't clever enough to cover their tracks or leave breadcrumb trails on purpose to mess with people.Why the fuck would a disease be exactly like an unrealistic fiction concept we created years ago for horror movies?
Nobody has any documents regarding tr-3b but it's been spotted out there. Admittedly it's hard to know the true capabilities, but that doesn't lead any support for the currentYear + X fallacy.How was this myth deconstructed? What is the evidence that government classified technical capability, is even able to be accurately assessed, by those fundamentally, institutionally and legally not even allowed be informed of it? Let alone interact with or test any of it. Or, even view documents discussing it, or related to it in any way at all? (Yes, the same can be applied to the pro claims. Not my point.)
That'd be quite the trick.
Also, the scenario regarding China is straight up false dillema logical fallacy. There are no grounds to claim you have knowledge of the way any government, or NGO would choose to reveal, or deploy any of its technologies. Therefore no basis to claim an "if this, then where's that?" scenario whatsoever. Only imagination.
Cheers