Z0diacK
NOT A SCHIZO
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2020
- Messages
- 615
- Reaction score
- 2,474
- Awards
- 199
One thing everyone has obviously noticed is the massive influx of faggots, which usually consists of underage people, just about legal boys who like to dress themselves in women clothing. And women that are all gay, they/them and get wet by the thought of comitting ball torture... One site in particular where this is the main influx of people is "Spacehey.com" where alot of underage boys and girls act grown up (they state their age in their bio usually) and talk about sex, dressing up as girls, loving a certain type of sexual thing. The girls there posts alot of selfies and like to give themselves alot of attention on this site, fitting with the Y2k/emo aesthetic.
So as I talk more about this, this kind of phenomena of young boys and girls wanting to fit into this aesthetic (which is sadly, not here anymore) eventually shows, that this aesthetic; Is a new way of grooming!
As you can on these sites which are completely public as hell, it's OBVIOUSLY troubled youth, wanting to make themselves special (heavy individualism) and crave attention through posting themselves, and talking like the discord introduction way (Thank you @Some_porcupine for sayiing that), which consists of interesting internet symbols, hearts, stars, :33, ---, ~~, usually when people (usually young) speak like that, they are heavily being groomed and this Y2K aeshetic makes it seem fun for these literal children. There are a couple of members here that are like that too, usually underage, that speak in this way, and are obviously being groomed currently and are very troubled.
Is this something new? No, but that doesn't equal to it not being a problem. Let me know what you think!
TL;DR: There's a massive influx on y2k aesthetic internet of underage "faggots" that are hypersexual and it's a new way of grooming
EDIT: I do this, because no one is understanding what I am saying. Y2K IS NOT PEDOPHILIC OR GROOMING IN ANY WAY. What I've been trying to say is, underage children are getting into this aesthetic which is for adults. Therefore, they are trying to FIT IN, and trying to act MATURE when they're obviously underage (just as looking "mature")
My point was, that on sites like spacehey.com, and some neocities websites, alot of underage children act mature, because they want to fit into the Y2K aesthetic (like low pants, showing alot of skin) which is fine when you're an adult, but it's not when children try to fit into an aesthetic not made for them. I hope this clears up on alot of things, this is not an attack on Y2K, this is merely an observation I made going through Y2k-esque sites. This usually turns into young kids to be hypersexual because of the adult themes this aesthetic has to offer (and the fact its trying to recreate the old internet) and groomers actively looking for young kids like that that are vulnerable. These kids turn out fucked up, as they usually become a femboy (at the age of 13) and the women just become retarded. Whatever you do as an adult is none of my concern, it's bad when children are doing it.
(Is this the only way kids are getting groomed? No, this is merely a part of it. Snapchat, tiktok, instagram is a way worse thing, that doesn't mean this is invalid, though.)
So as I talk more about this, this kind of phenomena of young boys and girls wanting to fit into this aesthetic (which is sadly, not here anymore) eventually shows, that this aesthetic; Is a new way of grooming!
As you can on these sites which are completely public as hell, it's OBVIOUSLY troubled youth, wanting to make themselves special (heavy individualism) and crave attention through posting themselves, and talking like the discord introduction way (Thank you @Some_porcupine for sayiing that), which consists of interesting internet symbols, hearts, stars, :33, ---, ~~, usually when people (usually young) speak like that, they are heavily being groomed and this Y2K aeshetic makes it seem fun for these literal children. There are a couple of members here that are like that too, usually underage, that speak in this way, and are obviously being groomed currently and are very troubled.
Is this something new? No, but that doesn't equal to it not being a problem. Let me know what you think!
TL;DR: There's a massive influx on y2k aesthetic internet of underage "faggots" that are hypersexual and it's a new way of grooming
EDIT: I do this, because no one is understanding what I am saying. Y2K IS NOT PEDOPHILIC OR GROOMING IN ANY WAY. What I've been trying to say is, underage children are getting into this aesthetic which is for adults. Therefore, they are trying to FIT IN, and trying to act MATURE when they're obviously underage (just as looking "mature")
My point was, that on sites like spacehey.com, and some neocities websites, alot of underage children act mature, because they want to fit into the Y2K aesthetic (like low pants, showing alot of skin) which is fine when you're an adult, but it's not when children try to fit into an aesthetic not made for them. I hope this clears up on alot of things, this is not an attack on Y2K, this is merely an observation I made going through Y2k-esque sites. This usually turns into young kids to be hypersexual because of the adult themes this aesthetic has to offer (and the fact its trying to recreate the old internet) and groomers actively looking for young kids like that that are vulnerable. These kids turn out fucked up, as they usually become a femboy (at the age of 13) and the women just become retarded. Whatever you do as an adult is none of my concern, it's bad when children are doing it.
(Is this the only way kids are getting groomed? No, this is merely a part of it. Snapchat, tiktok, instagram is a way worse thing, that doesn't mean this is invalid, though.)
Last edited: